These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8604867)

  • 1. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity.
    Todd KH; Funk KG; Funk JP; Bonacci R
    Ann Emerg Med; 1996 Apr; 27(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 8604867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale.
    Gallagher EJ; Liebman M; Bijur PE
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Dec; 38(6):633-8. PubMed ID: 11719741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED.
    Gallagher EJ; Bijur PE; Latimer C; Silver W
    Am J Emerg Med; 2002 Jul; 20(4):287-90. PubMed ID: 12098173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children.
    Powell CV; Kelly AM; Williams A
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jan; 37(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 11145767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain?
    Kelly AM
    Acad Emerg Med; 1998 Nov; 5(11):1086-90. PubMed ID: 9835471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinically significant changes in nausea as measured on a visual analog scale.
    Hendey GW; Donner NF; Fuller K
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Jan; 45(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 15635314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain.
    Kelly AM
    Emerg Med J; 2001 May; 18(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 11354213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores.
    Todd KH; Funk JP
    Acad Emerg Med; 1996 Feb; 3(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 8808375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Setting the benchmark for research in the management of acute pain in emergency departments.
    Kelly AM
    Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2001 Mar; 13(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 11476414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying the minimum clinically significant difference in acute pain in the elderly.
    Bijur PE; Chang AK; Esses D; Gallagher EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Nov; 56(5):517-521.e1. PubMed ID: 20303199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department.
    Bijur PE; Latimer CT; Gallagher EJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 10(4):390-2. PubMed ID: 12670856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of clinically significant changes in acute pain in children.
    Bulloch B; Tenenbein M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2002 Mar; 9(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 11874775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinically significant changes in acute pain in a pediatric ED using the Color Analog Scale.
    McConahay T; Bryson M; Bulloch B
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):739-42. PubMed ID: 17870473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale.
    Bird SB; Dickson EW
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Dec; 38(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 11719742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of the color analog scale: repeatability of scores in traumatic and nontraumatic injuries.
    Bulloch B; Garcia-Filion P; Notricia D; Bryson M; McConahay T
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 May; 16(5):465-9. PubMed ID: 19388922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problems with measurement of the minimum clinically significant difference in acute pain in elders.
    Bijur PE; Chang AK; Esses D; Gallagher EJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 18(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 21314771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain.
    Bijur PE; Silver W; Gallagher EJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2001 Dec; 8(12):1153-7. PubMed ID: 11733293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the visual analog scale to rate and monitor severity of nausea in the emergency department.
    Meek R; Kelly AM; Hu XF
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Dec; 16(12):1304-1310. PubMed ID: 20053251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal fentanyl to intravenous morphine for managing acute pain in children in the emergency department.
    Borland M; Jacobs I; King B; O'Brien D
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Mar; 49(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 17067720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized clinical trial of nebulized fentanyl citrate versus i.v. fentanyl citrate in children presenting to the emergency department with acute pain.
    Miner JR; Kletti C; Herold M; Hubbard D; Biros MH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Oct; 14(10):895-8. PubMed ID: 17898251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.