These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8605411)

  • 1. Denouement of an execution competency case: is Perry pyrrhic?
    Mossman D
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):269-84. PubMed ID: 8605411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
    Stricker BW
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
    Cantor JD
    Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Role of psychiatrists in capital punishment cases : a review].
    Nakajima N
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 11985117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perry v. Louisiana: can a state treat an incompetent prisoner to ready him for execution?
    Evans GL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(3):249-70. PubMed ID: 1777688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The involuntary medication of Jared Loughner and pretrial jail detainees in nonmedical correctional facilities.
    Felthous AR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 22396347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Restored to health to be put to death: reconciling the legal and ethical dilemmas of medicating to execute in Singleton v. Norris.
    Hensl KB
    Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):291-328. PubMed ID: 16485377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Between madness and death: the medicate-to-execute controversy.
    Latzer B
    Crim Justice Ethics; 2003; 22(2):3-14. PubMed ID: 15080128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Justices let stand ruling that allows forcibly drugging an inmate before execution.
    Lewis NA
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A16. PubMed ID: 14610765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treating incompetent defendants: the Supreme Court's decision is a tough Sell.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1335-6,1341. PubMed ID: 14557516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.
    Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treating those found incompetent for execution: ethical chaos with only one solution.
    Radelet ML; Barnard GW
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(4):297-308. PubMed ID: 3233347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perry v. Louisiana: medical ethics on death row--is judicial intervention warranted?
    Katz DL
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(3):707-29. PubMed ID: 12186078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. At law. One flew over the Supreme Court.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 1973926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Supreme court of Canada's "Beautiful Mind" case.
    Gray JE; O'Reilly RL
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 19643478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Involuntary administration of medication in the community: the judicial opportunity.
    Schmidt MJ; Geller JL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 2571371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. State can make inmate sane enough to execute.
    Liptak A
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Feb; ():A1, A27. PubMed ID: 12812158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involuntary patients' right to refuse medication: impact of the Riese decision on a California inpatient unit.
    Binder RL; McNiel DE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 1686192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protecting our mentally ill: a critique of the role of Indiana state courts in protecting involuntarily committed mental patients' right to refuse medication.
    Goff ML
    Indiana Law J; 2001; 76(4):983-1000. PubMed ID: 12455521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients' and psychiatrists' perceptions of clinical decisions during schizophrenia treatment.
    Hamann J; Mendel RT; Fink B; Pfeiffer H; Cohen R; Kissling W
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2008 Apr; 196(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 18414128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.