These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8605503)

  • 1. Dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of tissue conditioning materials.
    Pissiotis A; Panagiotouni E; Sofou A; Diakoyanni I; Kaloyannides A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Dec; 3(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 8605503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working times of elastomeric impression materials according to dimensional stability and detail reproduction.
    Tan E; Chai J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 8595114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of tissue conditioners upon the surface hardness of dental stone and improved dental stone.
    Panagiotouni E; Pissiotis A; Diakoyanni I; Kaloyannides A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Dec; 2(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 7920395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
    Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials during disinfection.
    Oda Y; Matsumoto T; Sumii T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 Feb; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8689737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of dimensional stability of elastomers].
    Calderari G; Maggioni M; Cataneo E; Bruno E; Maiorana C
    Attual Dent; 1990 Sep-30; 6(33):48-9, 52-5. PubMed ID: 2288679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.
    Walker MP; Petrie CS; Haj-Ali R; Spencer P; Dumas C; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 16336232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working time of synthetic elastomeric impression material.
    McConnell RJ; Johnson LN; Gratton DR
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1994 Jan; 60(1):49-50, 53-4. PubMed ID: 8293360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of tissue conditioners on the dynamic viscoelastic properties of a heat-polymerized denture base.
    Murata H; Toki K; Hong G; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 12447218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study of the surface hardness and dimensional stability of several intermaxillary registration materials.
    Chai J; Tan E; Pang IC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):538-42. PubMed ID: 7748448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates.
    Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18533981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts.
    al-Omari WM; Jones JC; Wood DJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Sep; 6(3):103-10. PubMed ID: 10218014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Rheological properties of elastomeric impression materials].
    Kikuchi M
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1287-302. PubMed ID: 2135157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Type IV gypsum compatibility with five addition-reaction silicone impression materials.
    Butta R; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Moles DR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):540-4. PubMed ID: 15942614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.