These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8605503)

  • 21. Roughness of denture materials: a comparative study.
    Zissis AJ; Polyzois GL; Yannikakis SA; Harrison A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 11203622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surface quality and long-term dimensional stability of current elastomeric impression materials after disinfection.
    Walker MP; Rondeau M; Petrie C; Tasca A; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 17559536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A study of the "thixotropic" property of elastomeric impression materials.
    Chai J; Pang IC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 8003196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties.
    German MJ; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):951-6. PubMed ID: 18164051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of various interim fixed prosthodontic materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
    Al-Sowygh ZH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24559525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The dimensional stability of hydrophilic impression materials after application of a disinfectant].
    Stoll R; Segschneider F; Stachniss V; Jürgensen R
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Nov; 46(11):718-21. PubMed ID: 1817870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Working time of elastomeric impression materials: relevance of rheological tests.
    Balkenhol M; Kanehira M; Finger WJ; Wöstmann B
    Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 18269123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Elastomeric impression materials].
    Anagnostopoulos T; Tsokas K
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1990; 34(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 2130039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adhesion of elastomeric impression materials to trays.
    Bindra B; Heath JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9049922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tissue conditioning materials as functional impression materials.
    Chander S; Hill M; Moore D; Morrow L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Jun; 15(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 17645067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pressure distribution using tissue conditioners on simplified edentulous ridge models. Part 2: The influence of the powder particle size and ethanol content.
    Shigeto N; Hamada T; Iwanaga H; Murata H
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):557-63. PubMed ID: 8595116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Two- and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials: effects of storage time and moisture contamination.
    Chandran DT; Jagger DC; Jagger RG; Barbour ME
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2010; 20(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 21084736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of polishing on surface roughness of tissue conditioners.
    Loney RW; Price RB; Murphy DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11203634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of salivary films on the surface properties of elastomeric impression materials.
    Vassilakos N; Fernandes CP
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Sep; 2(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8180615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems.
    Gerrow JD; Price RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9791798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 8778378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Wettability and accuracy of reproduction of impression materials].
    Bader F; Setz J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 May; 46(5):346-8. PubMed ID: 1817049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.