These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8607468)

  • 1. Distal movement of buccal segments with the "en masse" removable appliance--its value in treating patients with mild Class II, Division 1 malocclusions: Part I, clinical techniques (how to do it).
    Orton HS; Battagel JM; Ferguson R; Ferman AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Mar; 109(3):234-43. PubMed ID: 8607468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distal movement of buccal segments with the "en masse" removable appliance: its value in treating patients with mild Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Part II: the model measuring system and results.
    Orton HS; Battagel JM; Ferguson R; Ferman AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 8638579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment changes in Class I and mild Class II malocclusions using the en masse removable appliance.
    Battagel JM; Ryan A
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Feb; 20(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 9558760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A removable Class II appliance for simultaneous distalization and expansion.
    Gumus A; Arat ZM
    J Clin Orthod; 2005 Oct; 39(10):613-7. PubMed ID: 16244423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical application of the ACCO appliance. Part 1.
    Warren DW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Feb; 101(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 1739064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Five-year treatment results with a headgear-activator combination.
    Lehman R; Romuli A; Bakker V
    Eur J Orthod; 1988 Nov; 10(4):309-18. PubMed ID: 3061833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical application of the ACCO appliance. Part II.
    Warren DW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Mar; 101(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 1539545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Caldwell SF; Hymas TA; Timm TA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with severe crowding by a specially designed rapid maxillary expander.
    Wang H; Feng J; Lu P; Shen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):242-51. PubMed ID: 25636559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Sagittal first" management of a growing skeletal class II patient.
    Balasubramanian M; Ojha A
    J Clin Orthod; 2010 Aug; 44(8):473-80. PubMed ID: 21105584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentofacial effects of asymmetric headgear and cervical headgear with removable plate on unilateral molar distalization.
    Altug H; Bengi AO; Akin E; Karacay S
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):584-92. PubMed ID: 16097227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of Class II, division 1, cases with a maxillary traction splint.
    Seçkin O; Surucu R
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Mar; 21(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 2374804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
    Kaya B; Arman A; Uçkan S; Yazici AC
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The cervical headgear action in the mixed dentition on maxilla, mandible and teeth in class II, division 1, malocclusions--a cephalometric study (author's transl)].
    Henriques JF; Martins DR; Pinzan A
    Ortodontia; 1979; 12(2):76-86. PubMed ID: 397458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Jones jig molar distalization appliance with extraoral traction.
    Haydar S; Uner O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 10629519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition.
    Wieslander L
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 86(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6588755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II correction-reducing patient compliance: a review of the available techniques.
    McSherry PF; Bradley H
    J Orthod; 2000 Sep; 27(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 11099554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.