These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8608113)

  • 1. The prediction of fetal acidosis at birth by computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography.
    Keith RD; Greene KR
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Jan; 103(1):94-5. PubMed ID: 8608113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The prediction of fetal acidosis at birth by computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography.
    Chung TK; Mohajer MP; Yang ZJ; Chang AM; Sahota DS
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Jun; 102(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 7632636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The prediction of fetal acidosis at birth by computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography.
    Persad PS; Settatree RS
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Feb; 103(2):190-1. PubMed ID: 8616149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerised analysis of the fetal heart rate and relation to acidaemia at delivery.
    Strachan BK; Sahota DS; van Wijngaarden WJ; James DK; Chang AM
    BJOG; 2001 Aug; 108(8):848-52. PubMed ID: 11510711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity and specificity of intrapartum computerised FIGO criteria for cardiotocography and fetal scalp pH during labour: multicentre, observational study.
    Schiermeier S; Pildner von Steinburg S; Thieme A; Reinhard J; Daumer M; Scholz M; Hatzmann W; Schneider KT
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1557-63. PubMed ID: 18752587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer quantification of short-term variability as an adjunct to fetal electrocardiographic monitoring.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J; Kwee A; Westerhuis M; Visser GH
    BJOG; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1445-6. PubMed ID: 17949383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deceleration area and deceleration capacity: deficient predictors of fetal acidaemia in human labour. Visual versus computerised cardiotocography.
    Sholapurkar SL
    BJOG; 2021 Nov; 128(12):2054-2055. PubMed ID: 34342133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting the risk of metabolic acidosis for newborns based on fetal heart rate signal classification using support vector machines.
    Georgoulas G; Stylios CD; Groumpos PP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):875-84. PubMed ID: 16686410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in the ST-interval segment of the fetal electrocardiogram in relation to acid-base status at birth.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Yli B; Rosen KG
    BJOG; 2009 Jul; 116(8):1138-9; author reply 1139-40. PubMed ID: 19515155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis.
    Westerhuis ME; Kwee A; van Ginkel AA; Drogtrop AP; Gyselaers WJ; Visser GH
    BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1194-201. PubMed ID: 17501963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance.
    Amer-Wahlin I; Arulkumaran S; Hagberg H; Marsál K; Visser GH
    BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1191-3. PubMed ID: 17877671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of fetal heart rate variability analysis techniques.
    Hopkins P; Outram N; Löfgren N; Ifeachor EC; Rosén KG
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1784-7. PubMed ID: 17946070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis.
    Poddar A
    BJOG; 2008 Apr; 115(5):670; author reply 670-1. PubMed ID: 18333954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The factor time in fetal heart rate monitoring and the detection of acidosis using the WAS score.
    Roemer VM; Walden R
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2014 Apr; 218(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 24788837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computerising the intrapartum continuous cardiotocography does not add to its predictive value: AGAINST: Computerising the intrapartum CTG does add to its predictive value.
    Chauhan SP
    BJOG; 2019 Oct; 126(11):1364. PubMed ID: 31486224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal acidemia prediction through short-term variation assessed by antepartum computerized cardiotocography in pregnant women with hypertension syndrome.
    Garcia GS; Mariani Neto C; Araujo Júnior E; Garcia RL; Nardozza LM; Moron AF
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Aug; 278(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 18193253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The prediction of intrapartum fetal metabolic acidosis by fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Low JA; Cox MJ; Karchmar EJ; McGrath MJ; Pancham SR; Piercy WN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Feb; 139(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 7468698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Prognostic value of cardiotocograms during labor evaluated with Fisher's index in prediction of fetal acidosis].
    Błaszczak G; Pajak M
    Ginekol Pol; 1997 Aug; 68(8):344-7. PubMed ID: 9499006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quantitative Cardiotocography--what does it look like and what can we expect].
    Roemer VM; Walden R
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2006 Jun; 210(3):77-91. PubMed ID: 16794985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis.
    Ugwumadu A
    BJOG; 2008 Apr; 115(5):669-70; author reply 670-1. PubMed ID: 18333952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.