These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8608113)

  • 21. [Indirect standard cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus indirect quantitative cardiotocography--a randomized comparative study in intrapartum monitoring].
    Ignatov P; Atanasov B
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(5):3-10. PubMed ID: 23234029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A method for the automatic reconstruction of fetal cardiac signals from magnetocardiographic recordings.
    Mantini D; Alleva G; Comani S
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4763-81. PubMed ID: 16204871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to cardiotocography to predict fetal acidosis in labor--a multi-center, case controlled study.
    Norén H; Luttkus AK; Stupin JH; Blad S; Arulkumaran S; Erkkola R; Luzietti R; Visser GH; Yli B; Rosén KG
    J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 17685855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG-ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital.
    Doria V; Papageorghiou AT; Gustafsson A; Ugwumadu A; Farrer K; Arulkumaran S
    BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1202-7. PubMed ID: 17877672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is STAN monitoring associated with a significant decrease in metabolic acidosis at birth compared with cardiotocography alone? Review of the three meta-analyses that included the recent US trial.
    Vayssière C; Ehlinger V; Paret L; Arnaud C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Oct; 95(10):1190-1. PubMed ID: 27199086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intrapartum fetal surveillance.
    Ayres-de-Campos D
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():1-2. PubMed ID: 26302973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Diagnosis of disorders of the fetal status using computer-assisted cardiotocography].
    Chernukha EA; Khasin AZ; Zadorozhnyĭ IuN; Khasin LA
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Sep; (9):38-41. PubMed ID: 1746698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography--a randomised controlled study.
    Westerhuis M; Porath M; Mol BW; Kwee A
    BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1103. PubMed ID: 16956344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How well does reflectance pulse oximetry reflect intrapartum fetal acidosis?
    Stiller R; von Mering R; König V; Huch A; Huch R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1351-7. PubMed ID: 12066121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Preliminary results of fetal electroencephalography and cardiotocography].
    Hopp H; Heinrich J; Seidenschnur G; Beier R; Schultz H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1972 Aug; 32(8):629-34. PubMed ID: 5071812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fetal heart rate monitoring category 3 during the 2nd stage of labor is an independent predictor of fetal acidosis.
    Silberstein T; Sheiner E; Salem SY; Hamou B; Aricha B; Baumfeld Y; Yohay Z; Elharar D; Idan I; Yohay D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Feb; 30(3):257-260. PubMed ID: 27023800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A novel technique for the extraction of fetal ECG using polynomial networks.
    Assaleh K; Al-Nashash H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1148-52. PubMed ID: 15977746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Avoiding common mistakes in FHR monitoring. (Part II)].
    Markwitz W; Ropacka M
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Feb; 79(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 18510096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Avoiding common mistakes in FHR monitoring. (Part III)].
    Markwitz W; Ropacka M
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Mar; 79(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 18592859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ST analysis as an adjunct to electronic fetal monitoring: an overview.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Miller LA
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2010; 24(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 20697240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impediments to a unified international approach to the interpretation and management of intrapartum cardiotocographs.
    Parer JT; Ugwumadu A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Feb; 30(3):272-273. PubMed ID: 27046650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Bader TJ; Morgan MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):643; author reply 643-4. PubMed ID: 7898851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Quantitative cardiotocography].
    Atanasov B; Ignatov P
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2008; 47(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 18642579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Feature selection using genetic algorithms for fetal heart rate analysis.
    Xu L; Redman CW; Payne SJ; Georgieva A
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1357-71. PubMed ID: 24854596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [CTG: microfluctuation].
    Roemer VM
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2004 Dec; 208(6):210-9. PubMed ID: 15647984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.