BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8608272)

  • 1. Time to face up to research misconduct.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dealing with deception.
    Lancet; 1996 Mar; 347(9005):843. PubMed ID: 8622383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
    Farthing MJ
    Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives.
    Chantler C; Chantler S
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters.
    Farthing MJ
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevention and management of fraud--in theory.
    Riis P
    J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 8308472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Call for research misconduct agency.
    White C
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter.
    Goldbeck-Wood S
    BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1252. PubMed ID: 11644976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research.
    Wells F
    Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Honest advice from Denmark.
    Riis P
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1733. PubMed ID: 9652924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editors seek ways to cope with fraud.
    Williams N
    Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5341):1221. PubMed ID: 9411745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity.
    Rennie D
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1726-8. PubMed ID: 9614029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misconduct in research. Misconduct is not reported in biomedical journals in France.
    Maisonneuve H
    BMJ; 1996 Jul; 313(7049):109. PubMed ID: 8688718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1686-7. PubMed ID: 9614011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Whistle blowing and countersuits: the President's Commission and fraudulent research.
    Shannon TA
    IRB; 1981; 3(7):6-7. PubMed ID: 11649398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical and scientific fraud.
    Robinson RG
    N Z Med J; 1994 Jun; 107(979):216-7. PubMed ID: 8208480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of research misconduct--in practice.
    Wells FO
    J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 8308473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific misconduct in medical research.
    Verma BL; Shukla GD
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 90(8):222-5. PubMed ID: 1460306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.