264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8608272)
21. Fraud in drug research.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1992 Aug; 340(8817):477-8. PubMed ID: 11643085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Research misconduct: a brief history and a comparison.
Lock S
J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 8308474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Scientific misconduct: exaggerated fear but still real and requiring a proportionate response.
Horton R
Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9172):7-8. PubMed ID: 10406357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. UK royal college responds to scientific fraud.
Ramsay S
Lancet; 1995 Jun; 345(8964):1566. PubMed ID: 11657385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud.
Abbott A
Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6722):13-7. PubMed ID: 10078516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud.
Lock S
BMJ; 1995 Jun; 310(6994):1547-8. PubMed ID: 7787632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: is it prejudicial to patient safety?
Wells F
Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev; 1992; 11(4):241-55. PubMed ID: 11652183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. Causes, investigation and prevention. A report of the Royal College of Physicians.
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1991 Apr; 25(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 2066936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. UK fraud verdict prompts moves on ethics..
Abdulla S
Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6532):529. PubMed ID: 7791862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain?
Lock S
BMJ; 1988 Dec; 297(6662):1531-5. PubMed ID: 3147062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Editors call for misconduct watchdog.
Williams N
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1685-6. PubMed ID: 9660704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Burdens of proof of misconduct.
Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6573):367. PubMed ID: 8602225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. On the hazards of whistleblowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists in our time.
Edsall JT
Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 11657783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Research misconduct -- have we reached the turning point at last?
Jay P
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Jan; 5(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 11658010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The code of silence.
Wilmshurst P
Lancet; 1997 Feb; 349(9051):567-9. PubMed ID: 9048805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Research fraud: discouraging the others.
Lock S
BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6765):1348. PubMed ID: 11642809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Science police.
Dolnick E
Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing.
Koshland DE
Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):585. PubMed ID: 11644303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
