These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8608272)

  • 41. British editors form misconduct panel.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Whistleblowing: a very unpleasant avocation.
    Sprague RL
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):103-33. PubMed ID: 11653080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. GMC gets tough with fraudulent doctors.
    Dillner L
    BMJ; 1991 Dec; 303(6816):1493. PubMed ID: 11642956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The assault on David Baltimore.
    Kevles DJ
    New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography.
    Anderson J
    J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Whistleblowing in biomedical research: report from a workshop.
    Mishkin B
    IRB; 1982 Feb; 4(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 11658314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Consultant struck off over research fraud.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7102):205. PubMed ID: 11644983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Deceit in science: does it really matter?
    Birch AJ
    Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Alternative dispute resolution and research misconduct.
    Guenin LM
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1997; 6(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 9111964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Misconduct in science: should its definition include mischievous or improper allegations?
    Burgman MA
    Q Rev Biol; 1994 Jun; 69(2):233-5. PubMed ID: 8066177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Scientific misconduct. Ill-defined, redefined.
    Palca J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):4. PubMed ID: 8891701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Scientific misconduct--does it exist?
    Böttiger LE
    J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 8308471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
    LaFollette MC
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Heat rises over UCSD 'misconduct' charge.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6617):566. PubMed ID: 9024644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Of whistleblowers, investigators, and judges.
    Scarr S; Ernhart CB
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 11652255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Research ban on fraudulent doctor.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8836):45. PubMed ID: 11643225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Study proposed on integrity of published data.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Oct; 371(6500):733. PubMed ID: 7935825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Medicine needs its MI5.
    Campbell D
    BMJ; 1997 Dec 20-27; 315(7123):1677-80. PubMed ID: 9448539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.