These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8608469)

  • 1. Assessment of radiation risk from screening mammography.
    Feig SA
    Cancer; 1996 Mar; 77(5):818-22. PubMed ID: 8608469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk benefit in mass screening programs for breast cancer.
    Miller AB
    Semin Oncol; 1978 Dec; 5(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 104389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential hazards of mammography.
    Atkins CD
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Feb; 25(5):604; author reply 605. PubMed ID: 17290073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mammography screening--neglected aspects of radiation risks].
    Kuni H; Schmitz-Feuerhake I; Dieckmann H
    Gesundheitswesen; 2003 Jul; 65(7):443-6. PubMed ID: 12891476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography screening for breast cancer.
    Med Lett Drugs Ther; 1980 Jun; 22(13):53-4. PubMed ID: 7382906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits versus risks from mammography: a critical reassessment.
    Mettler FA; Upton AC; Kelsey CA; Ashby RN; Rosenberg RD; Linver MN
    Cancer; 1996 Mar; 77(5):903-9. PubMed ID: 8608482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new method for assessment of radiation risk from screening mammography.
    Feig SA
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1990; 119():141-50. PubMed ID: 2236855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Routine screening mammography: how important is the radiation-risk side of the benefit-risk equation?
    Brenner DJ; Sawant SG; Hande MP; Miller RC; Elliston CD; Fu Z; Randers-Pehrson G; Marino SA
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Dec; 78(12):1065-7. PubMed ID: 12556334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mass screening of cancer of the breast: politico-economic objectives and their underestimated risks].
    Dilhuydy MH
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1998 Jun; 26(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 9691519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Radiation exposure and radiation risk of the patient in mammography].
    Hasert V
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1988; 29(4):605-9. PubMed ID: 3174959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation hazard in mammography.
    Strax P
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1977; 12():247-50. PubMed ID: 918104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographically determined breast density and cancer risk.
    Hall FM
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):1083; author reply 1083. PubMed ID: 18710999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors for induction of breast cancer by X-rays and their implications for breast screening.
    Law J; Faulkner K; Young KC
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):261-6. PubMed ID: 17038413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-view screening and extending the age range: the balance of benefit and risk.
    Law J; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Nov; 75(899):889-94. PubMed ID: 12466254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concerning the relationship between benefit and radiation risk, and cancers detected and induced, in a breast screening programme.
    Law J; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Aug; 75(896):678-84. PubMed ID: 12153942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Benefit-risk analysis for mass screening of stomach cancer in Japan. I. Life-saving vs. loss of life (author's transl)].
    Iinuma TA; Tateno Y; Hashizume T; Umegaki Y; Kitabatake T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1977 Dec; 37(12):1109-21. PubMed ID: 609531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammography's upside outweighs possible risks.
    Feig SA; Hendrick RE
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1993 Mar; 15(3):121-5, 128, 141. PubMed ID: 10148388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening mammography. A risk versus risk decision.
    Ritenour ER; Hendee WR
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jan; 24(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 2645240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation risk and mammographic screening of women from 40 to 49 years of age: effect on breast cancer rates and years of life.
    Mattsson A; Leitz W; Rutqvist LE
    Br J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 82(1):220-6. PubMed ID: 10638993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The mammography debate.
    Berg AO
    Am Fam Physician; 2002 Dec; 66(12):2211-2. PubMed ID: 12507159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.