These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8609284)

  • 21. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1460-70. PubMed ID: 10738801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distortion product otoacoustic emission delay measurement in human ears.
    Mahoney CF; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3721-35. PubMed ID: 7790651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distortion product otoacoustic emission generation mechanisms and their dependence on stimulus level and primary frequency ratio.
    Botti T; Sisto R; Sanjust F; Moleti A; D'Amato L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):658-73. PubMed ID: 26936550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions created through the interaction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and externally generated tones.
    Norrix LW; Glattke TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):945-55. PubMed ID: 8759948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visualization of the onset of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, and measurement of their latency.
    Whitehead ML; Stagner BB; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1663-79. PubMed ID: 8817893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of sound intensity on f1-sweep and f2-sweep distortion product otoacoustic emissions phase delay estimates in human adults.
    Bowman DM; Brown DK; Eggermont JJ; Kimberley BP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1550-9. PubMed ID: 9069625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A research for basic properties of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing subjects].
    Liu A; Cui Y; Huang H
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Oct; 12(10):435-8. PubMed ID: 11263229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and basilar membrane vibration in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.
    Rhode WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2725-37. PubMed ID: 18189565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Level dependence of the nonlinear-distortion component of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Zelle D; Thiericke JP; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3475-90. PubMed ID: 26723305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Parameters to maximize 2f2-f1 distortion product otoacoustic emission levels.
    Horn JH; Pratt SR; Durrant JD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1620-9. PubMed ID: 18664689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stimulus ratio dependence of low-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Christensen AT; Ordoñez R; Hammershøi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):679-89. PubMed ID: 25698003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A systematic review of stimulus parameters for eliciting distortion product otoacoustic emissions from adult humans.
    Petersen L; Wilson WJ; Kathard H
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):382-391. PubMed ID: 28635500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitudes and latencies in the groups of older people with presbyacusis and young people with normal hearing].
    Namysłowski G; Morawski K; Urbaniec P; Lisowska G
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2000; 54(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 11070698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cochlear generation of intermodulation distortion revealed by DPOAE frequency functions in normal and impaired ears.
    Stover LJ; Neely ST; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2669-78. PubMed ID: 10573884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans.
    Dreisbach LE; Siegel JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2456-69. PubMed ID: 11757935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio.
    Harris FP; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Stagner BB; Coats AC; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 2921404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.