These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8609291)

  • 1. The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Feb; 99(2):1079-90. PubMed ID: 8609291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains.
    McKay CM; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):347-57. PubMed ID: 9921661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.
    McKay CM; Remine MD; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1514-24. PubMed ID: 11572362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual dissimilarities among acoustic stimuli and ipsilateral electric stimuli.
    McDermott HJ; Sucher CM
    Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 218(1-2):81-8. PubMed ID: 16777362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jul; 96(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 8064018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual Spaces Induced by Cochlear Implant All-Polar Stimulation Mode.
    Marozeau J; McKay CM
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems.
    Boëx C; de Balthasar C; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2049-57. PubMed ID: 14587604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The perceptual effects of current pulse duration in electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):998-1009. PubMed ID: 10462805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
    Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual electrode stimulation using the nucleus CI24RE cochlear implant: electrode impedance and pitch ranking studies.
    Busby PA; Plant KL
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16230899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e22-e38. PubMed ID: 27579987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.
    Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Claes A; Van Rompaey V; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e149-59. PubMed ID: 26583480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
    Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L).
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA; Litvak L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):623-6. PubMed ID: 16158620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients.
    Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 May; 77(5):1881-8. PubMed ID: 3839004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.