These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

790 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8609329)

  • 1. Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Swerdlow CD; Ahern T; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Chen PS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 27(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8609329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).
    Day JD; Doshi RN; Belott P; Birgersdotter-Green U; Behboodikhah M; Ott P; Glatter KA; Tobias S; Frumin H; Lee BK; Merillat J; Wiener I; Wang S; Grogin H; Chun S; Patrawalla R; Crandall B; Osborn JS; Weiss JP; Lappe DL; Neuman S
    Circulation; 2007 May; 115(18):2382-9. PubMed ID: 17470697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of the defibrillation threshold using the upper limit of vulnerability following defibrillator implantation.
    Kirilmaz A; Dokumaci B; Uzun M; Kilicaslan F; Dinckal MH; Yucel O; Karaca M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):498-505. PubMed ID: 15955181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs.
    Swerdlow CD; Shehata M; Chen PS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 17338725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of the upper limit of vulnerability using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator electrograms.
    Swerdlow C; Shivkumar K; Zhang J
    Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(24):3028-33. PubMed ID: 12810611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Upper limit of vulnerability reliably predicts the defibrillation threshold in humans.
    Hwang C; Swerdlow CD; Kass RM; Gang ES; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS
    Circulation; 1994 Nov; 90(5):2308-14. PubMed ID: 7955188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient-tailored implantable cardioverter defibrillator testing using the upper limit of vulnerability: the TULIP protocol.
    Lemke B; Lawo T; Zarse M; Lubinski A; Kreutzer U; Mueller J; Schuchert A; Mitzenheim S; Danilovic D; Deneke T;
    Europace; 2008 Aug; 10(8):907-13. PubMed ID: 18515789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Upper limit of vulnerability determination during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement to minimize ventricular fibrillation inductions.
    Glikson M; Gurevitz OT; Trusty JM; Sharma V; Luria DM; Eldar M; Shen WK; Rea RF; Hammill SC; Friedman PA
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 94(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 15566924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial clinical experience with endocardial defibrillation using an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator with a triple-electrode system.
    Saksena S; Tullo NG; Krol RB; Mauro AM
    Arch Intern Med; 1989 Oct; 149(10):2333-9. PubMed ID: 2802898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of ventricular vulnerable period and ventricular fibrillation threshold by use of T-wave shocks in patients undergoing implantation of cardioverter/defibrillators.
    Hou CJ; Chang-Sing P; Flynn E; Martinez L; Peterson J; Ottoboni LK; Liem LB; Sung RJ
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(9):2558-64. PubMed ID: 7586357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated vulnerability testing identifies patients with inadequate defibrillation safety margin.
    Birgersdotter-Green U; Ruetz LL; Anand K; Monir G; Abeyratne AI; Bailey JR; Shorofsky SR; Hsia HH; Friedman PA
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Dec; 5(6):1073-80. PubMed ID: 23051838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of drive cycle length on initiation of ventricular fibrillation during implantable cardioverter defibrillator threshold testing.
    Sanghvi NK; Lelorier P; Gururaj AV; Monahan KM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Sep; 29(9):926-9. PubMed ID: 16981914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Achieving sufficient safety margins with fixed duration waveforms and the use of multiple time constants.
    Keane D; Aweh N; Hynes B; Sheahan RG; Cripps T; Bashir Y; Zaidi A; Fahy G; Lowe M; Doherty P; Kroll MK
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 May; 30(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 17461867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multicenter experience with a pectoral unipolar implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Active Can Investigators.
    Bardy GH; Yee R; Jung W
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Aug; 28(2):400-10. PubMed ID: 8800117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of shock polarity reversal on defibrillation threshold in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
    Zienciuk A; Lubiński A; Królak T; Lewicka-Nowak E; Kempa M; Pazdyga A; Raczak G
    Kardiol Pol; 2007 May; 65(5):495-500; discussion 501-2. PubMed ID: 17577846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of adequate safety margin using single coupling interval-upper limit of vulnerability test.
    Patel MB; Pandya K; Thakur RK
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 24033830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between the upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm and the defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
    Hui RC; Rosenthal L; Ramza B; Nsah E; Lawrence J; Tomaselli G; Berger R; Calkins H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 21(4 Pt 1):687-93. PubMed ID: 9584298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of induction method on defibrillation threshold and ventricular fibrillation cycle length.
    Zima E; Gergely M; Soós P; Gellér LA; Nemes A; Acsády G; Merkely B
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Apr; 17(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 16643358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.
    Birgersdotter-Green U; Undesser K; Fujimura O; Feld GK; Kass RM; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 10387143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic determination of timing intervals for upper limit of vulnerability using ICD electrograms.
    Shehata M; Belk P; Kremers M; Saba S; Cao J; Swerdlow CD
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):691-700. PubMed ID: 18507541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.