These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 860976)

  • 1. Visual field contraction during G stress at 13 degrees, 45 degrees, and 65 degrees seatback angles.
    Gillingham KK; McNaughton GB
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1977 Feb; 48(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 860976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re-evaluation of a tilt-back seat as a means of increasing acceleration tolerance.
    Burns JW
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1975 Jan; 46(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 1115697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of several G-tolerance measuring methods at various seatback angles.
    Voge VM
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1978 Feb; 49(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 637793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human tolerance to aerial combat maneuvers.
    Burton RR; Shaffstall RM
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1980 Jul; 51(7):641-8. PubMed ID: 7417127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A simulation study on G protection using tilt-back seat].
    Lu H; Bai J; Zhang L
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 1997 Feb; 10(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11539891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psycho-physiological assessment of acceleration-induced changes in various seat configurations.
    Voge VM
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1977 Jun; 48(6):527-38. PubMed ID: 869840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting human tolerance to sustained acceleration.
    Hrebien L; Hendler E
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1985 Jan; 56(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 3977799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined influences of gravitoinertial force level and visual field pitch on visually perceived eye level.
    DiZio P; Li W; Lackner JR; Matin L
    J Vestib Res; 1997; 7(5):381-92. PubMed ID: 9376912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physiologic effects of seatback angles 45degrees (from the vertical) relative to G.
    Burton RR; Iampietro PF; Leverett SD
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1975 Jul; 46(7):887-97. PubMed ID: 1156299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protection to +12 Gz.
    Burns JW; Ivan DJ; Stern CH; Patterson JC; Johnson PC; Drew WE; Yates JT
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 May; 72(5):413-21. PubMed ID: 11346005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. G stress on A-10 pilots during JAWS II exercises.
    Gillingham KK; Makalous DL; Tays MA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1982 Apr; 53(4):336-41. PubMed ID: 7082249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining techniques to enhance protection against high sustained accelerative forces.
    Cohen MM
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1983 Apr; 54(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 6847571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anti-G suit inflation rate requirements.
    Burton RR
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1988 Jul; 59(7):601-5. PubMed ID: 3408420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences between syncope resulting from rapid onset acceleration and orthostatic stress.
    Self DA; White CD; Shaffstall RM; Mtinangi BL; Croft JS; Hainsworth R
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 Jun; 67(6):547-54. PubMed ID: 8827136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [+Gz protection provided by tilt-back seat and GZ-2 anti-G suit].
    Xu Y; Geng XC; Wang H; Jin Z; Yan GD
    Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Nov; 19(4):368-71. PubMed ID: 21166235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of head and body position on +Gz acceleration tolerance.
    Tong A; Hill RC; Tripp L; Webb JT
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1994 May; 65(5 Suppl):A90-4. PubMed ID: 8018087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-G stress and orientational stress: physiologic effects of aerial maneuvering.
    Gillingham KK
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1988 Nov; 59(11 Pt 2):A10-20. PubMed ID: 3060092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partial supination versus Gz protection.
    Wood EH; Code CF; Baldes EJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1990 Sep; 61(9):850-8. PubMed ID: 2241754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual field recovery after vision restoration therapy (VRT) is independent of eye movements: an eye tracker study.
    Kasten E; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 175(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16970999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technique for simulating G-induced tunnel vision.
    Whinnery JE
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1979 Oct; 50(10):1076. PubMed ID: 518454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.