These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8611313)

  • 21. [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
    Galanski M; Prokop M; Thorns E; Oestmann JW; Reichelt S; Haubitz B; Milbradt H; Gräser A; Verner L; Schaefer C
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 1733477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Variable compensation technique for digital radiography of the chest.
    Dobbins JT; Powell AO
    Radiology; 1989 Nov; 173(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 2798877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Observer evaluation of scatter subtraction for digital portable chest radiographs.
    Baker JA; Floyd CE; Lo JY; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Aug; 28(8):667-70. PubMed ID: 8375997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Effect of digital radiography processing parameters on digital chest radiograph for occupational exposed workers].
    Wang XH; Liu DS; Xuan X; Kang H; Yuan HS
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 May; 31(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 23803524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease.
    Schaefer CM; Greene R; Oestmann JW; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Pile-Spellman ER; Rubens JR
    Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):207-10. PubMed ID: 2294549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of varying high pass filter parameters on the detectability of isolated pulmonary nodules in digitized chest images.
    Foley WD; Wilson CR; San Dretto M
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Apr; 21(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 3700043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Image intensifier based digital chest radiography. Visibility of lesions and anatomy.
    Kheddache S; Denbratt L; Angelhed JE; Schlossman D
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Nov; 34(6):618-21. PubMed ID: 8240899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.
    Boone JM; Duryea J; Moore EH
    Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 7644654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector.
    Neitzel U; Maack I; Günther-Kohfahl S
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 8058016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interpretation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities: conventional versus storage phosphor radiography.
    Kido S; Ikezoe J; Takeuchi N; Kondoh H; Tomiyama N; Jokoh T; Kohno N; Takashima S; Yamagami H; Naito H
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 8475302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Clinical results of dual-energy radiography in thoracic studies].
    Bautz W; Kalender WA
    Rofo; 1987 May; 146(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 3035630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.
    Miró SP; Leung AN; Rubin GD; Choi YH; Kee ST; Mindelzun RE; Stark P; Wexler L; Plevritis SK; Betts BJ
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of an improved CAD scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in digital chest images.
    Xu XW; Doi K; Kobayashi T; MacMahon H; Giger ML
    Med Phys; 1997 Sep; 24(9):1395-403. PubMed ID: 9304567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Technical evaluation of a digital chest radiography system that uses a selenium detector.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):264-70. PubMed ID: 7892483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Digital radiography of the thorax].
    Frija J; de Kerviler E; Zagdanski AM; Feger C; Attal P; Laval-Jeantet M
    J Radiol; 1997 Mar; 78(3):193-207. PubMed ID: 9113146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.