These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 861322)

  • 1. Latency of multiple skin conductance responses in differential classical conditioning.
    Kotses H; Glaus KD
    Biol Psychol; 1977 Mar; 5(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 861322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential conditioning of electrodermal responses: effects of performing a masking task during the interstimulus and intertrial intervals.
    Wilson RA; Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE
    Biol Psychol; 1974; 2(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 4425718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ontogeny of interstimulus interval (ISI) discrimination of the conditioned eyeblink response in rats.
    Brown KL; Pagani JH; Stanton ME
    Behav Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 120(5):1057-70. PubMed ID: 17014257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interstimulus intervals for skin conductance response measurement.
    Breska A; Maoz K; Ben-Shakhar G
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Apr; 48(4):437-40. PubMed ID: 20701710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential classical conditioning of positive and negative skin potentials.
    Glaus K; Kotses H
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Jan; 102(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 4809660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Warning signals and alerting: effects on differential classical conditioning.
    Ross SM; Ross LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1977 Sep; 3(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 894218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Latent inhibition in the conditioned electrodermal response.
    Surwit RS; Poser EG
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 Mar; 86(3):543-8. PubMed ID: 4814770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interrelationships between human classical differential electrodermal conditioning, orienting reaction, responsivity, and awareness of stimulus contingencies.
    Furedy JJ; Schiffmann K
    Psychophysiology; 1974 Jan; 11(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 4810437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eyelid response topography in differential interstimulus interval conditioning.
    Kadlac JA; Grant DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1977 May; 3(3):345-55. PubMed ID: 870612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditioned orienting and defensive responses.
    Hare RD; Blevings G
    Psychophysiology; 1975 May; 12(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 1153634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrodermal responses during appetitive conditioning are sensitive to contingency instruction ambiguity.
    van den Akker K; Nederkoorn C; Jansen A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Aug; 118():40-47. PubMed ID: 28614704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diazepam suppresses the acquisition but not the expression of 'fear-potentiation' of the acoustic startle response in man.
    Scaife JC; Langley RW; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    J Psychopharmacol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 15982989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of potentially phobic conditioned stimuli on retention, reconditioning, and extinction of the conditioned skin conductance response.
    Schell AM; Dawson ME; Marinkovic K
    Psychophysiology; 1991 Mar; 28(2):140-53. PubMed ID: 1946880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dishabituation of the electrodermal orienting response following decay of sensitization.
    Edwards JA; Siddle DA
    Biol Psychol; 1976 Mar; 4(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 938704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Classical skin conductance response conditioning: effects of intermittent reinforcement and information about schedule contingencies.
    Williams WC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Jul; 104(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 1194863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classical conditioning of autonomic responses in alert and drowsy subjects.
    McDonald DG; Johnson LC
    Biol Psychol; 1975 Sep; 3(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 1225364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In dubio pro defensio: initial activation of conditioned fear is not cue specific.
    Weike AI; Schupp HT; Hamm AO
    Behav Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 122(3):685-96. PubMed ID: 18513138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential SCR conditioning with two control baselines: random signal and signal absent.
    Prokasy WF; Williams WC; Kumpfer KL; Lee WY; Jenson WR
    Psychophysiology; 1973 Mar; 10(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 4691789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of warning-signal duration on the early and late components of the contingent negative variation.
    Klorman R; Bentsen E
    Biol Psychol; 1975 Dec; 3(4):263-75. PubMed ID: 1212484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of UCS intensity and duration of exposure of nonreinforced CS on conditioned electrodermal responses: an experimental analysis of the incubation theory of anxiety.
    Chorot P; Sandín B
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):931-41. PubMed ID: 8302996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.