BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8613436)

  • 1. Usefulness of ultrasonography combined with conventional physical examination in mass screening for breast cancer: a retrospective study of Yamanashi Health Care Center results from 1989 to 1994.
    Okamoto H; Ogawara T; Arihara F; Kobayashi K; Inoue S; Nagahori K; Yamamoto M; Sekikawa T; Matsumoto Y
    Jpn J Cancer Res; 1996 Mar; 87(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 8613436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved detection rate of early breast cancer in mass screening combined with mammography.
    Ohuchi N; Yoshida K; Kimura M; Ouchi A; Kamioki S; Shiiba K; Matoba N; Kojima S; Takahashi K; Matsuno S
    Jpn J Cancer Res; 1993 Jul; 84(7):807-12. PubMed ID: 8396569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic mammography and ultrasonography for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years.
    Osako T; Iwase T; Takahashi K; Iijima K; Miyagi Y; Nishimura S; Tada K; Makita M; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G; Kasumi F
    Breast Cancer; 2007; 14(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 17690501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
    Nowicki A; Stogowska I
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Current problems in mass screening for breast cancer].
    Morimoto T; Yamakawa T; Mitsuyama N
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1985 Dec; 12(12):2273-83. PubMed ID: 4073925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening ultrasonography revealed 15% of mammographically occult breast cancers.
    Uchida K; Yamashita A; Kawase K; Kamiya K
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 18224382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of adding screening ultrasonography to screening mammography on patient recall and cancer detection rates: a retrospective study in Japan.
    Tohno E; Umemoto T; Sasaki K; Morishima I; Ueno E
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1227-30. PubMed ID: 23465737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection.
    Kaiser JS; Helvie MA; Blacklaw RL; Roubidoux MA
    Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):839-44. PubMed ID: 12034957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound screening of breast cancer.
    Tohno E; Ueno E; Watanabe H
    Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 19009372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable breast cancers.
    Fisher CS; Mushawah FA; Cyr AE; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3198-203. PubMed ID: 21861232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic screening for non-palpable breast cancer in Japan.
    Ohnuki K
    Breast Cancer; 2005; 12(4):258-66. PubMed ID: 16286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Palpable presentation of breast cancer persists in the era of screening mammography.
    Mathis KL; Hoskin TL; Boughey JC; Crownhart BS; Brandt KR; Vachon CM; Grant CS; Degnim AC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Mar; 210(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 20193894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
    Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonography-guided breast-conserving surgery is superior to palpation-guided surgery for palpable breast cancer.
    Eggemann H; Ignatov T; Beni A; Costa SD; Ignatov A
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 24169374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Breast cancer detected by mass screening using physical examination alone].
    Morimoto T; Komaki K; Monden Y
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1988 Apr; 15(4 Pt 2-1):944-51. PubMed ID: 3389838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative and combined performance of mammography and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in the general population: a pilot study in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan.
    Honjo S; Ando J; Tsukioka T; Morikubo H; Ichimura M; Sunagawa M; Hasegawa T; Watanabe T; Kodama T; Tominaga K; Sasagawa M; Koyama Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Sep; 37(9):715-20. PubMed ID: 17766996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonpalpable breast cancer in women aged 40-49 years: a surgeon's view of benefits from screening mammography.
    Chang HR; Cole B; Bland KI
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):145-9. PubMed ID: 9709291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic performance and color overlay pattern in shear wave elastography (SWE) for palpable breast mass.
    Park J; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Kang EY
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1943-8. PubMed ID: 26141224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.