157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8613436)
21. Improving breast cancer detection using ultrasonography in asymptomatic women with non-fatty breast density.
Korpraphong P; Limsuwarn P; Tangcharoensathien W; Ansusingha T; Thephamongkhol K; Chuthapisith S
Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):903-8. PubMed ID: 24103915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Unilateral breast cancer: screening of contralateral breast by using preoperative MR imaging reduces incidence of metachronous cancer.
Kim JY; Cho N; Koo HR; Yi A; Kim WH; Lee SH; Chang JM; Han W; Moon HG; Im SA; Noh DY; Moon WK
Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23329656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Breast ultrasound in office gynecology--ten years of experience.
Lenz S
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S3-7. PubMed ID: 20938894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Whole-breast US imaging: four-year follow-up.
Kopans DB; Meyer JE; Lindfors KK
Radiology; 1985 Nov; 157(2):505-7. PubMed ID: 3901112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Palpable solid breast masses: retrospective single- and multimodality evaluation of 201 lesions.
van Dam PA; Van Goethem ML; Kersschot E; Vervliet J; Van den Veyver IB; De Schepper A; Buytaert P
Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):435-9. PubMed ID: 3275983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An evaluation of mass screening for breast cancer.
Inoue K; Morimoto T; Sonoo H; Koshiba Y; Kitamura M; Kakuta E; Fujiwara H; Nishiyama F
Jpn J Surg; 1981 Jan; 11(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 7311184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of ultrasound evaluation in the detection of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.
Fishman DA; Cohen L; Blank SV; Shulman L; Singh D; Bozorgi K; Tamura R; Timor-Tritsch I; Schwartz PE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1214-21; discussion 1221-2. PubMed ID: 15846205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Screening Ultrasound in Women with Negative Mammography: Outcome Analysis.
Hwang JY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hahn SY; Nam MY
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Sep; 56(5):1352-8. PubMed ID: 26256979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prostate cancer: comparison of transrectal US and digital rectal examination for screening.
Lee F; Littrup PJ; Torp-Pedersen ST; Mettlin C; McHugh TA; Gray JM; Kumasaka GH; McLeary RD
Radiology; 1988 Aug; 168(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 3293108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Use of radiothermometry in the screening of nonpalpable breast neoplasms].
Avramenko GV
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2007; (5):9-12. PubMed ID: 18655289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ability of mammography to reveal nonpalpable breast cancer in women with palpable breast masses.
Rosen EL; Sickles E; Keating D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 9930773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High detection rate of breast cancer by mass screening using mammography in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Harada K; Sagara Y
Jpn J Cancer Res; 1994 Dec; 85(12):1193-5. PubMed ID: 7852181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Breast self-examination also valuable in women participating in a screening programme].
Zonderhuis BM; Meijer S; Been J; Groot JJ; Langenhorst F; van den Tol MP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2341-5. PubMed ID: 19024066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A significant number of women present with palpable breast cancer even with a normal mammogram within 1 year.
Haakinson DJ; Stucky CC; Dueck AC; Gray RJ; Wasif N; Apsey HA; Pockaj B
Am J Surg; 2010 Dec; 200(6):712-7; discussion 717-8. PubMed ID: 21146009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review.
Moy L; Slanetz PJ; Moore R; Satija S; Yeh ED; McCarthy KA; Hall D; Staffa M; Rafferty EA; Halpern E; Kopans DB
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 12355002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinicopathological characteristics and long-term prognosis of screening detected non-palpable breast cancer by ultrasound in hospital-based Chinese population (2001-2014).
Pan B; Yao R; Zhu QL; Wang CJ; You SS; Zhang J; Xu QQ; Cai F; Shi J; Zhou YD; Mao F; Lin Y; Guan JH; Shen SJ; Liang ZY; Jiang YX; Sun Q
Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(47):76840-76851. PubMed ID: 27689334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
