157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8613436)
41. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Stomper PC; Gelman RS
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Mass screening for breast cancer--the results for 15 years].
Ueda N; Nakano Y; Fujita M; Fujiwara A; Horino T; Usugane M; Ota J; Kumanishi Y; Tsukahara Y; Kimoto Y
Gan No Rinsho; 1985 Nov; 31(14):1781-6. PubMed ID: 4087383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. US screening for detection of nonpalpable locoregional recurrence after mastectomy.
Lee JH; Kim EK; Oh JY; Kwon HC; Kim SH; Kim DC; Lee M; Cho SH; Nam KJ
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):485-9. PubMed ID: 23131395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study.
Brem RF; Tabár L; Duffy SW; Inciardi MF; Guingrich JA; Hashimoto BE; Lander MR; Lapidus RL; Peterson MK; Rapelyea JA; Roux S; Schilling KJ; Shah BA; Torrente J; Wynn RT; Miller DP
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 25329763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The DOM project for the early detection of breast cancer, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
de Waard F; Collette HJ; Rombach JJ; Baanders-van Halewijn EA; Honing C
J Chronic Dis; 1984; 37(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 6690457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A Comparison of Mass Screening for Breast Cancer Using Mammography and Physical Examination Alone in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Harada K; Sagara Y
Breast Cancer; 1995 Apr; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 11091528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms.
Bae MS; Han W; Koo HR; Cho N; Chang JM; Yi A; Park IA; Noh DY; Choi WS; Moon WK
Cancer Sci; 2011 Oct; 102(10):1862-7. PubMed ID: 21752153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Axillary node dissection in patients with breast cancer diagnosed through the Ontario Breast Screening Program: a need for minimally invasive techniques.
Singhal H; O'Malley FP; Tweedie E; Stitt L; Tonkin KS
Can J Surg; 1997 Oct; 40(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 9336528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Breast cancer detected by mass screening using physical examination alone.
Morimoto T; Komaki K; Oshimo K; Yamakawa T; Mitsuyama N; Tanaka T; Monden Y
Jpn J Surg; 1987 Sep; 17(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 3430900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Breast cancer: value of various examinations in the diagnosis of the primary lesion].
Díez-Caballero A; Martínez-Regueira F; Sierra A; Espí A; Cebeiro JM; Zornoza A
Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1997; 41(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 10420921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Supplemental Screening Breast US in Women with Negative Mammographic Findings: Effect of Routine Axillary Scanning.
Lee SH; Yi A; Jang MJ; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):830-837. PubMed ID: 29083988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The quality of mass screening for breast cancer by physical examination.
Morimoto T; Komaki K; Mori T; Sasa M; Ooshimo K; Miki H; Monden Y; Inui K; Saoyama N; Yoshida H
Surg Today; 1993; 23(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 8467170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Clinical examination as a screening method for breast cancer.
McLatchie G; McArdle C; Menzies T
Scott Med J; 1982 Apr; 27(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 7089527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A comparison of breast cancers detected by mass screening and those found in out-patient clinics.
Noguchi M; Earashi M; Ohta N; Kitagawa H; Thomas M; Miyazaki I
Surg Today; 1993; 23(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 8318787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Current Status of Screening for Breast Cancer and Tasks for Introduction of Mammographic Screening in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M
Breast Cancer; 1998 Jul; 5(3):227-234. PubMed ID: 11091653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Clinical breast examination: preliminary results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in India.
Sankaranarayanan R; Ramadas K; Thara S; Muwonge R; Prabhakar J; Augustine P; Venugopal M; Anju G; Mathew BS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Oct; 103(19):1476-80. PubMed ID: 21862730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
