These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8614754)

  • 1. Assessment of small health risks based on exact sample sizes.
    Abt K; Gülich A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 8614754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidence intervals for a ratio of two independent binomial proportions.
    Price RM; Bonett DG
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5497-508. PubMed ID: 18781560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Setting sample size to ensure narrow confidence intervals for precise estimation of population values.
    Corty EW; Corty RW
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 21336224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 8614740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sampling--how big a sample?
    Aitken CG
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Jul; 44(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 10432610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The homogenetic estimate for the variance of survival rate.
    Zhao G
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 8614745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size determination for controlling the upper confidence limit of incidence rate of a binomial endpoint.
    Shen LZ
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Jul; 8(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 9741861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The extremal quotient in small-area variation analysis.
    Kazandjian VA; Durance PW; Schork MA
    Health Serv Res; 1989 Dec; 24(5):665-84. PubMed ID: 2584039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Likelihood-based confidence intervals for a log-normal mean.
    Wu J; Wong AC; Jiang G
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1849-60. PubMed ID: 12754720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence intervals based on some weighting functions for the difference of two binomial proportions.
    Maruo K; Kawai N
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2288-96. PubMed ID: 24644149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Challenging the validity of conclusions based on P-values alone: a critique of contemporary clinical research design and methods.
    Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Dorey F; Sarmiento A
    Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():587-600. PubMed ID: 9097190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size and the width of the confidence interval for mean difference.
    Liu XS
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):201-15. PubMed ID: 18208638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calculating confidence intervals for prediction error in microarray classification using resampling.
    Jiang W; Varma S; Simon R
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article8. PubMed ID: 18312213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):515-23. PubMed ID: 16011699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.
    Tang ML; Tang NS; Chan IS
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3565-79. PubMed ID: 16261646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Out-of-specification test results from the statistical point of view.
    Köppel H; Schneider B; Wätzig H
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2007 Jul; 44(3):718-29. PubMed ID: 17462848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confidence limits of the probability of success in animal experiments and clinical studies: a Bayesian approach.
    Stavreva N; Stavrev P; Fallone GB
    Phys Med; 2009 Mar; 25(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 18280763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of nutritional screening and assessment tools.
    Jones JM
    Nutrition; 2004 Mar; 20(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 14990273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of the standard deviation in the estimation of benchmark doses with continuous data.
    Gaylor DW; Slikker W
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1683-7. PubMed ID: 15660621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.