These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8614898)
21. Class I and II posterior composite resin restorations after 5 and 10 years. Lundin SA; Koch G Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(5-6):165-71. PubMed ID: 10901600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation. Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vivo occlusal wear of posterior composite restorations. Lewis G Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 1803330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Microhardness and porosity of Class 2 light-cured composite restorations cured with a transparent cone attached to the light-curing wand. Von Beetzen M; Li J; Nicander I; Sundström F Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8415161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical performance and wear resistance of two compomers in posterior occlusal restorations of permanent teeth: six-year follow-up. Lund RG; Sehn FP; Piva E; Detoni D; Moura FR; Cardoso PE; Demarco FF Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 17427819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Occlusal margin defects around different types of composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. Bryant RW; Marzbani N; Hodge KV Oper Dent; 1992; 17(6):215-21. PubMed ID: 1303514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material. Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results. Bottenberg P; Alaerts M; Keulemans F J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Mair LH Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):483-90. PubMed ID: 9807127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study. Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations. Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A clinical trial of four light-curing posterior composite resins: two-year report. Dietschi D; Holz J Quintessence Int; 1990 Dec; 21(12):965-75. PubMed ID: 2082424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations. Wucher M; Grobler SR; Senekal PJ Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. One-year comparison of metallic and translucent matrices in Class II composite resin restorations. Cenci MS; Demarco FF; Pereira CL; Lund RG; de Carvalho RM Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 17380807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall. Burgess JO; Gallo JR; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. Manhart J; Neuerer P; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Hickel R J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11005901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An up to 3-year randomized clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin composites used to restore worn posterior teeth. Bartlett D; Sundaram G Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 17165303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations. Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]