220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8615317)
1. Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements.
Strickberger SA; Daoud E; Goyal R; Chan KK; Bogun F; Castellani M; Harvey M; Horwood LE; Niebauer M; Man KC; Morady F
Am Heart J; 1996 May; 131(5):961-5. PubMed ID: 8615317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of first-phase polarity of biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold with a single transvenous lead system.
Strickberger SA; Man KC; Daoud E; Neary MP; Horwood LE; Niebauer M; Hummel JD; Morady F
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 25(7):1605-8. PubMed ID: 7759712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biphasic waveform defibrillation using a three-electrode transvenous lead system in humans.
Marks ML; Johnson G; Hofer BO; Bardy GH
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 8186880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of shock polarity on ventricular defibrillation threshold using a transvenous lead system.
Strickberger SA; Hummel JD; Horwood LE; Jentzer J; Daoud E; Niebauer M; Bakr O; Man KC; Williamson BD; Kou W
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Oct; 24(4):1069-72. PubMed ID: 7930199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.
Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of sodium channel blockade on the defibrillation energy requirements of biphasic versus monophasic shocks.
Nelson SD; Lenhart MB; Saffarin A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 1):1568-73. PubMed ID: 8946452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks.
Szili-Torok T; Theuns D; Verblaauw T; Scholten M; Kimman GJ; Res J; Jordaens L
Acta Cardiol; 2002 Oct; 57(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 12405569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leads.
Saksena S; An H; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Burkhardt E; Mehta D; John T
Am J Cardiol; 1992 Aug; 70(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 1632393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic pulses: does the advantage of biphasic shocks depend on the waveshape?
Natale A; Sra J; Krum D; Dhala A; Deshpande S; Jazayeri M; Axtell K; Degroot P; VanHout WL; Akhtar M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul; 18(7):1354-61. PubMed ID: 7567587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of biphasic waveforms for human nonthoracotomy defibrillation.
Swartz JF; Fletcher RD; Karasik PE
Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2646-54. PubMed ID: 8252675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Truncated biphasic pulses for transthoracic defibrillation.
Bardy GH; Gliner BE; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Jones GK; Anderson J; Troutman C; Johnson G
Circulation; 1995 Mar; 91(6):1768-74. PubMed ID: 7882486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transthoracic biphasic waveform defibrillation at very high and very low energies: a comparison with monophasic waveforms in an animal model of ventricular fibrillation.
Clark CB; Zhang Y; Davies LR; Karlsson G; Kerber RE
Resuscitation; 2002 Aug; 54(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 12161298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.
Ricard P; Lévy S; Boccara G; Lakhal E; Bardy G
Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 11333061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for external defibrillation. Physio-Control Biphasic Investigators.
Higgins SL; Herre JM; Epstein AE; Greer GS; Friedman PL; Gleva ML; Porterfield JG; Chapman FW; Finkel ES; Schmitt PW; Nova RC; Greene HL
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2000; 4(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 11045408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep.
Cooper RA; Alferness CA; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Circulation; 1993 May; 87(5):1673-86. PubMed ID: 8491023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biphasic shocks compared with monophasic damped sine wave shocks for direct ventricular defibrillation during open heart surgery.
Schwarz B; Bowdle TA; Jett GK; Mair P; Lindner KH; Aldea GS; Lazzara RG; O'Grady SG; Schmitt PW; Walker RG; Chapman FW; Tacker WA
Anesthesiology; 2003 May; 98(5):1063-9. PubMed ID: 12717126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biphasic and monophasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Faddy SC; Powell J; Craig JC
Resuscitation; 2003 Jul; 58(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12867304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway.
Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polarity reversal improves defibrillation efficacy in patients undergoing transvenous cardioverter defibrillator implantation with biphasic shocks.
Schauerte P; Stellbrink C; Schöndube FA; Löser H; Haltern G; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 20(2 Pt 1):301-6. PubMed ID: 9058867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimized pulse durations minimize the effect of polarity reversal on defibrillation efficacy with biphasic shocks.
Schauerte P; Schöndube FA; Grossmann M; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P; Stellbrink C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 May; 22(5):790-7. PubMed ID: 10353140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
