These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The JYD angle: a modified method of establishing sagittal apical base relationship. Järvinen S Eur J Orthod; 1982 Nov; 4(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 6959814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lower incisor dentoalveolar compensation and symphysis dimensions among Class I and III malocclusion patients with different facial vertical skeletal patterns. Molina-Berlanga N; Llopis-Perez J; Flores-Mir C; Puigdollers A Angle Orthod; 2013 Nov; 83(6):948-55. PubMed ID: 23758599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Incisor repositioning: a new approach in orthodontics]. Dallel I; Khemiri M; Fathallah S; Ben Rejeb S; Tobji S; Ben Amor A Orthod Fr; 2015 Dec; 86(4):327-38. PubMed ID: 26655419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric analysis. Joshi M; Wu LP; Maharjan S; Regmi MR Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():8. PubMed ID: 26061982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cephalometric analysis of Malay children with and without unilateral cleft lip and palate. Ebin LE; Zam NM; Othman SA Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 21175027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Japanese and European overbite depth indicator and antero-posterior dysplasia indicator values. Freudenthaler J; Celar A; Kubota M; Akimoto S; Sato S; Schneider B Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 21393373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion. Dhopatkar A; Bhatia S; Rock P Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 12401055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Class II division 2 skeletal pattern. Brezniak N; Arad A; Heler M; Wasserstein A Angle Orthod; 1998 Apr; 68(2):104. PubMed ID: 9564418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite. Uzuner FD; Aslan BI; Dinçer M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):248-256.e2. PubMed ID: 31375235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion. Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Racial variation of cephalometric measurements in Hawaii. Chung CS; Kau MC; Walker GF J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1982; 2(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 7174781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of levelling of the curve of Spee on the proclination of mandibular incisors and expansion of dental arches: a prospective clinical trial. Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Sifakakis I; Makou M; Eliades T Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20575202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients. Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and validity of MicroScribe-3DXL system in comparison with radiographic cephalometric system: Angular measurements. Barmou MM; Hussain SF; Abu Hassan MI Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):314-327. PubMed ID: 29673688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships. Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of arch forms between Egyptian and North American white populations. Bayome M; Sameshima GT; Kim Y; Nojima K; Baek SH; Kook YA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):e245-52. PubMed ID: 21392668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]