These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8617158)

  • 1. Digital radiographic images will benefit endodontic services.
    Lavelle CL; Wu CJ
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1995 Dec; 11(6):253-60. PubMed ID: 8617158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of direct intraoral sensors in the provision of endodontic services.
    Lavelle CL
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1999 Feb; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10219147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Nov; 82(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 8936525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy.
    Yokota ET; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7714421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images.
    Mistak EJ; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; West LA; Runyan DA
    J Endod; 1998 Apr; 24(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9641132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws.
    Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 17048029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When will excellent radiographic images be available to the general dental office?
    Lavelle CL; Wu CJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Nov; 23(4):183-91. PubMed ID: 7835522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Periapical radiographic techniques during endodontic diagnosis and treatment.
    Fava LR; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 1997 Jul; 30(4):250-61. PubMed ID: 9477811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial resolution requirements for digitizing dental radiographs.
    Kassebaum DK; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Waggener RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):760-9. PubMed ID: 2740097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography.
    Barbat J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1998 Dec; 24(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10023266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
    Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems.
    Patel S; Dawood A; Whaites E; Pitt Ford T
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jun; 42(6):447-62. PubMed ID: 19298577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal bone level buccal to mandibular molars in digital radiographs from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems. An in vitro study.
    Borg E; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    J Clin Periodontol; 1997 May; 24(5):306-12. PubMed ID: 9178109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging.
    Tirrell BC; Miles DA; Brown CE; Legan JJ
    J Endod; 1996 Feb; 22(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 8935022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs.
    Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 9103793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of image quality in direct digital radiography after application of various image treatment filters for detectability of dental disease.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8299831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.