These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8617160)

  • 21. Retrograde seal in ultrasonically prepared canals.
    Sutimuntanakul S; Worayoskowit W; Mangkornkarn C
    J Endod; 2000 Aug; 26(8):444-6. PubMed ID: 11199775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the apical seal of amalgam retrofillings with the use of a root canal sealer interface.
    Cathers SJ; Roahen JO
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Sep; 76(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 8378048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A radiographic study of the effect of various retrograde fillings on periapical healing after replantation.
    Andreasen JO; Pitt Ford TR
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1994 Dec; 10(6):276-81. PubMed ID: 7867616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of smear layer and root-end cavity thickness on apical sealing ability of MTA as a root-end filling material: a bacterial leakage study.
    Yildirim T; Er K; Taşdemir T; Tahan E; Buruk K; Serper A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e67-72. PubMed ID: 20123373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Solubility and bacterial sealing ability of MTA and root-end filling materials.
    Espir CG; Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM; Spin-Neto R; Chávez-Andrade GM; Berbert FL; Tanomaru-Filho M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016 Apr; 24(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 27119759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of sealing capabilities of amalgum, GIC and zinc oxide eugenol cement when used as retro grade filling materials (in vitro study).
    Ansari SR; Qayyum Z; Khitab U
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2003; 15(3):43-6. PubMed ID: 14727340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An electrochemical study of the sealing ability of different retrofilling materials.
    Alhadainy HA; Elsaed HY; Elbaghdady YM
    J Endod; 1993 Oct; 19(10):508-11. PubMed ID: 8120486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of intermediate restorative materials.
    Lim KC
    J Endod; 1990 Mar; 16(3):116-8. PubMed ID: 2388027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of an acid environment on leakage of root-end filling materials.
    Roy CO; Jeansonne BG; Gerrets TF
    J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 11487169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An in vitro comparison of micro leakage in three glass ionomer cements used as retrograde filling materials.
    Rosales JI; Vallecillo M; Osorio R; Bravo M; Toledano M
    Int Dent J; 1996 Feb; 46(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 8744913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sealing ability of MTA, Super EBA, Vitremer and amalgam as root-end filling materials.
    Pereira CL; Cenci MS; Demarco FF
    Braz Oral Res; 2004; 18(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 16089263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage around bonded amalgam coronal-radicular cores in endodontically treated molar teeth.
    Howdle MD; Fox K; Youngson CC
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 11887532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vitro evaluation of injectable thermoplasticized gutta-percha, glass ionomer, and amalgam when used as retrofilling materials.
    Olson AK; MacPherson MG; Hartwell GR; Weller RN; Kulild JC
    J Endod; 1990 Aug; 16(8):361-4. PubMed ID: 2081952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term durability of root-end sealing with 4-MEtA/MMA-TBB resin.
    Tanaka Y; Sugaya T; Tanaka S; Kawanami M
    Dent Mater J; 2004 Dec; 23(4):453-6. PubMed ID: 15688706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bacterial leakage of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling material.
    Torabinejad M; Rastegar AF; Kettering JD; Pitt Ford TR
    J Endod; 1995 Mar; 21(3):109-12. PubMed ID: 7561650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Leakage associated with intermediate restorative material and glass-ionomer cement retrograde fillings: a human and sheep teeth comparison with 2 different aging procedures.
    Roux D; Doméjean-Orliaguet S; Saade M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jan; 93(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 11805780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the sealing ability of amalgam, Cavit, and glass ionomer cement in the repair of furcation perforations.
    Alhadainy HA; Himel VT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Mar; 75(3):362-6. PubMed ID: 8469550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of an apatite cement as a root end filling material.
    MacDonald A; Moore BK; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Dec; 20(12):598-604. PubMed ID: 7759987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement used as root-end filling materials.
    Shahi S; Yavari HR; Rahimi S; Eskandarinezhad M; Shakouei S; Unchi M
    J Oral Sci; 2011 Dec; 53(4):517-22. PubMed ID: 22167039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Marginal adaptation of root-end filling materials: an in vitro study with teeth and replicas.
    Costa AT; Konrath F; Dedavid B; Weber JB; de Oliveira MG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 19279975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.