These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8617393)

  • 1. Radiographic detectability of periodontal diseases. A comparison of perapical radiography with detailed zonography.
    Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Vähätalo K; Rosberg J; Tammisalo EH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8617393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of detailed zonography with periapical radiography for the detection of periapical lesions.
    Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Rosberg J; Vähätalo K; Tammisalo EH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 May; 24(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 9515382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detailed tomography of periapical and periodontal lesions. Diagnostic accuracy compared with periapical radiography.
    Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Vähätalo K; Neva M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 9446979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of periapical and detailed narrow-beam radiography for diagnosis of periodontal pathology.
    Tammisalo T; Vähätalo K; Luostarinen T; Leimola-Virtanen R; Tammisalo EH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 7835510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of periapical and detailed narrow-beam radiography for diagnosis of periapical bone lesions.
    Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Vähätalo K; Tammisalo EH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 8181644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of radiographs in the diagnosis of periodontal disease.
    Tugnait A; Carmichael F
    Dent Update; 2005 Nov; 32(9):536-8, 541-2. PubMed ID: 16317887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiographic detectability of bone loss in the bifurcation of mandibular molars: an experimental study.
    Gürgan C; Gröndahl K; Wennström JL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 7835514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between probing bone loss and standardized radiographic analysis.
    Kiliç AR; Efeoglu E; Yilmaz S; Orgun T
    Periodontal Clin Investig; 1998; 20(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9663121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy.
    Yokota ET; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7714421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of computer-aided image interpretation to the diagnosis of periapical bone lesions.
    Mol A; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Nov; 21(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 1299632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography.
    Barbat J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1998 Dec; 24(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10023266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic evaluation of alveolar crest obscured by dental implants.
    Ludlow JB; Nason RH; Hutchens LH; Moriarty J
    Implant Dent; 1995; 4(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 7550080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Nov; 82(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 8936525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observer variation in the radiographic assessment of the bone level on the buccal and lingual surfaces of mandibular molars.
    Gürgan C; Gröndahl K; Wennström
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 8617389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography.
    Patel S; Dawood A; Mannocci F; Wilson R; Pitt Ford T
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jun; 42(6):507-15. PubMed ID: 19298574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws.
    Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 17048029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.