These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8618093)

  • 1. An evaluation of the Canal Master, balanced force, and step-back techniques.
    Hankins PJ; ElDeeb ME
    J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 8618093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration.
    Leseberg DA; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1919403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed.
    Shadid DB; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1998 Oct; 24(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10023246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
    Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
    Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
    Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of rotational speed and the curvature of root canals on the breakage of rotary endodontic instruments.
    Zelada G; Varela P; Martín B; Bahíllo JG; Magán F; Ahn S
    J Endod; 2002 Jul; 28(7):540-2. PubMed ID: 12126386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of four instrumentation techniques on curved canals: a comparison study.
    Schäfer E
    J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):685-9. PubMed ID: 9220756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The risk of furcal perforation in mandibular molars using Gates-Glidden drills with anticurvature pressure.
    Wu MK; van der Sluis LW; Wesselink PR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 15716849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of maintenance of canal curvature using balanced-force instrumentation with three different file types.
    Royal JR; Donnelly JC
    J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):300-4. PubMed ID: 7673837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The evaluation of the ability of Apex D.S.P. to determine the length of root canal. In vitro study].
    Lewińska E; Lipski M; Marciniak-Paradowska M; Woźniak K; Lichota D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 19374229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thickness of dentine in mesial roots of mandibular molars with different lengths.
    Sauáia TS; Gomes BP; Pinheiro ET; Zaia AA; Ferraz CC; Souza-Filho FJ; Valdrighi L
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jul; 43(7):555-9. PubMed ID: 20636516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yun HH; Kim SK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria.
    Card SJ; Sigurdsson A; Orstavik D; Trope M
    J Endod; 2002 Nov; 28(11):779-83. PubMed ID: 12470024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.