These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8618164)

  • 21. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of FE idealisation, load conditions and interface assumptions on the stress distribution and fatigue notch factor in the human femur with an endoprosthesis.
    Hedia HS; Barton DC; Fisher J; Elmidany TT
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 8922259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cementless stem fixation and primary stability under physiological-like loads in vitro.
    Heller MO; Kassi JP; Perka C; Duda GN
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Dec; 50(12):394-9. PubMed ID: 16429942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study.
    Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Mar; 19(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15003345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Subject specific finite element analysis of implant stability for a cementless femoral stem.
    Pettersen SH; Wik TS; Skallerud B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jul; 24(6):480-7. PubMed ID: 19368993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Design factors influencing performance of constrained acetabular liners: finite element characterization.
    Bouchard SM; Stewart KJ; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(5):885-93. PubMed ID: 16488227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of three variables on the stresses in a three-dimensional model of a proximal tibia-total knee implant construct.
    Sarathi Kopparti P; Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2007; 17(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 17264384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.
    Long JP; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():115-22. PubMed ID: 17016222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
    Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cortical and interfacial bone changes around a non-cemented hip implant: simulations using a combined strain/damage remodelling algorithm.
    Scannell PT; Prendergast PJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):477-88. PubMed ID: 19188086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Norman TL; Thyagarajan G; Saligrama VC; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1325-33. PubMed ID: 11522312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
    Bellini CM; Galbusera F; Ceroni RG; Raimondi MT
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stem curvature and load angle influence the initial relative bone-implant motion of cementless femoral stems.
    Berzins A; Sumner DR; Andriacchi TP; Galante JO
    J Orthop Res; 1993 Sep; 11(5):758-69. PubMed ID: 8410476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of the fixation stiffness of some femoral stems of different designs.
    Sakai R; Kanai N; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 16431001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Static coefficient of friction between stainless steel and PMMA used in cemented hip and knee implants.
    Nuño N; Groppetti R; Senin N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):956-62. PubMed ID: 16860449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
    Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.