These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8619360)
1. Safety and efficacy of Xenetix, a new iodinated contrast agent, in pediatric angiocardiography. Rossignol AM; Lusson JR; Chantepie A; Losay J Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():81-4. PubMed ID: 8619360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective, randomized trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) in cardiac catheterization. Vijayalakshmi K; Williams D; Wright RA; Hall JA; Harcombe AA; Linker NJ; Stewart MJ; Davies A; de Belder MA J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 16(12):707-11. PubMed ID: 15596875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Iobitridol 300 compared to iopromide 300--a double-blind randomized phase-III study of clinical tolerance in total body CT. Hoogewoud HM; Woessmer B Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():62-4. PubMed ID: 8619354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical tolerance and diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol in contrast-enhanced CT in children. Smets A; Shaw D Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():65-7. PubMed ID: 8619355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical tolerance and diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 300 in lower limb angiography. Stockx L; Wilms G; Baert AL; Terrier F Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():72-4. PubMed ID: 8619357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and efficacy of the new iodinated nonionic low-osmolality contrast medium Iobitridol (Xenetix) in coronary and ventricular angiography. Lefevre T; Funck F; Aliot E; Ethevenot B Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():75-80. PubMed ID: 8619358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical experience with iobitridol 250-300 in digital subtraction angiography. Double-blind randomized studies vs. iopromide and iohexol. Bouard JC; Lyonnet D; Illes JP; Bouard-Monnier C; Rouviere O; Pangaud C Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():85-8. PubMed ID: 8619361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Iobitridol 250 vs iohexol 240 in phlebography of th lower limbs. A double-blind clinical trial. Chagnaud C; Moulin G; Bartoli JM; Rousseau H; Railhac JJ; Lyonnet D Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():89-91. PubMed ID: 8619362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the clinical safety and efficacy of iobitridol (Xenetix) in intravenous urography. Fournier PJ; Steinbrich W; Freitag P; Voegeli E Eur J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 23(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 9003922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In response to: K. Vijayalakshmi, et al, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 707-711: A prospective, randomized trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) in cardiac catheterization. Pinès E; Zamia P; Idée JM J Invasive Cardiol; 2005 Feb; 17(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 15770762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In response to: K. Vijayalakshmi, et al, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 707-711: A prospective, randomized trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) in cardiac catheterization. Gayet JL; Lefevre T J Invasive Cardiol; 2005 Feb; 17(2):124. PubMed ID: 15770763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative study of iohexol and iopamidol as cardioangiographic contrast media]. Esplugas E; Jara F; Sala J; Cequier A Rev Esp Cardiol; 1990 Feb; 43(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 2326538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical safety and efficacy of iobitridol in urography. Meiss L; Bakker AJ; Falke TH; Van Waes PF Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():68-71. PubMed ID: 8619356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Less iodine injected for the same diagnostic performances: comparison of two low-osmolar contrast agents (iobitridol 350 and iopamidol 370) in coronary angiography and ventriculography: a randomized double-blind clinical study. Velázquez MT; Albarrán A; Hernández F; García Tejada J; Zueco J; Andreu J; De la Torre JM; Figueroa A; Sainz F; Tascón J Acta Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 65(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 20821930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Double-blind study of the safety, tolerance, and diagnostic efficacy of iopromide as compared with iopamidol and iohexol in patients requiring aortography and visceral angiography. Faykus MH; Cope C; Athanasoulis C; Druy EM; Hedgcock M; Miller FJ; Bron K Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S98-101; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Iopentol (Imagopaque 300) compared with iopromide (Ultravist 300) in pediatric angiocardiography. A clinical trial assessing adverse events, ECG and diagnostic information. Piéchaud JF; Iserin L; Aggoun Y; Kachaner J; Skinningsrud K Eur Radiol; 1997; 7 Suppl 4():S127-30. PubMed ID: 9204354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of iobitridol versus iohexol for contrast-enhanced CT of the head. Drouillard J; Froment JC; Frija G; Caille JM; Gandon Y; Clarisse J; Gaston A Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():56-61. PubMed ID: 8619353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of the safety and efficacy of iobitridol in more than 61,000 patients. Petersein J; Peters CR; Wolf M; Hamm B Eur Radiol; 2003 Aug; 13(8):2006-11. PubMed ID: 12942302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Are nonionic contrast media identical in their tolerability? Results of a double-blind randomized multicenter study with iomeprol and iopromide]. Schmiedel E Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 9340014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of intravenous contrast agents for CT studies in children. Cohen MD; Herman E; Herron D; White SJ; Smith JA Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):592-5. PubMed ID: 1449887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]