113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8619360)
1. Safety and efficacy of Xenetix, a new iodinated contrast agent, in pediatric angiocardiography.
Rossignol AM; Lusson JR; Chantepie A; Losay J
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():81-4. PubMed ID: 8619360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective, randomized trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) in cardiac catheterization.
Vijayalakshmi K; Williams D; Wright RA; Hall JA; Harcombe AA; Linker NJ; Stewart MJ; Davies A; de Belder MA
J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 16(12):707-11. PubMed ID: 15596875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Iobitridol 300 compared to iopromide 300--a double-blind randomized phase-III study of clinical tolerance in total body CT.
Hoogewoud HM; Woessmer B
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():62-4. PubMed ID: 8619354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical tolerance and diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol in contrast-enhanced CT in children.
Smets A; Shaw D
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():65-7. PubMed ID: 8619355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical tolerance and diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 300 in lower limb angiography.
Stockx L; Wilms G; Baert AL; Terrier F
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():72-4. PubMed ID: 8619357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and efficacy of the new iodinated nonionic low-osmolality contrast medium Iobitridol (Xenetix) in coronary and ventricular angiography.
Lefevre T; Funck F; Aliot E; Ethevenot B
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():75-80. PubMed ID: 8619358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical experience with iobitridol 250-300 in digital subtraction angiography. Double-blind randomized studies vs. iopromide and iohexol.
Bouard JC; Lyonnet D; Illes JP; Bouard-Monnier C; Rouviere O; Pangaud C
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():85-8. PubMed ID: 8619361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Iobitridol 250 vs iohexol 240 in phlebography of th lower limbs. A double-blind clinical trial.
Chagnaud C; Moulin G; Bartoli JM; Rousseau H; Railhac JJ; Lyonnet D
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():89-91. PubMed ID: 8619362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the clinical safety and efficacy of iobitridol (Xenetix) in intravenous urography.
Fournier PJ; Steinbrich W; Freitag P; Voegeli E
Eur J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 23(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 9003922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In response to: K. Vijayalakshmi, et al, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 707-711: A prospective, randomized trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) in cardiac catheterization.
Pinès E; Zamia P; Idée JM
J Invasive Cardiol; 2005 Feb; 17(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 15770762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In response to: K. Vijayalakshmi, et al, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 707-711: A prospective, randomized trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) in cardiac catheterization.
Gayet JL; Lefevre T
J Invasive Cardiol; 2005 Feb; 17(2):124. PubMed ID: 15770763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative study of iohexol and iopamidol as cardioangiographic contrast media].
Esplugas E; Jara F; Sala J; Cequier A
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1990 Feb; 43(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 2326538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical safety and efficacy of iobitridol in urography.
Meiss L; Bakker AJ; Falke TH; Van Waes PF
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():68-71. PubMed ID: 8619356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Less iodine injected for the same diagnostic performances: comparison of two low-osmolar contrast agents (iobitridol 350 and iopamidol 370) in coronary angiography and ventriculography: a randomized double-blind clinical study.
Velázquez MT; Albarrán A; Hernández F; García Tejada J; Zueco J; Andreu J; De la Torre JM; Figueroa A; Sainz F; Tascón J
Acta Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 65(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 20821930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Double-blind study of the safety, tolerance, and diagnostic efficacy of iopromide as compared with iopamidol and iohexol in patients requiring aortography and visceral angiography.
Faykus MH; Cope C; Athanasoulis C; Druy EM; Hedgcock M; Miller FJ; Bron K
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S98-101; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Iopentol (Imagopaque 300) compared with iopromide (Ultravist 300) in pediatric angiocardiography. A clinical trial assessing adverse events, ECG and diagnostic information.
Piéchaud JF; Iserin L; Aggoun Y; Kachaner J; Skinningsrud K
Eur Radiol; 1997; 7 Suppl 4():S127-30. PubMed ID: 9204354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of iobitridol versus iohexol for contrast-enhanced CT of the head.
Drouillard J; Froment JC; Frija G; Caille JM; Gandon Y; Clarisse J; Gaston A
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():56-61. PubMed ID: 8619353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of the safety and efficacy of iobitridol in more than 61,000 patients.
Petersein J; Peters CR; Wolf M; Hamm B
Eur Radiol; 2003 Aug; 13(8):2006-11. PubMed ID: 12942302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Are nonionic contrast media identical in their tolerability? Results of a double-blind randomized multicenter study with iomeprol and iopromide].
Schmiedel E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 9340014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of intravenous contrast agents for CT studies in children.
Cohen MD; Herman E; Herron D; White SJ; Smith JA
Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):592-5. PubMed ID: 1449887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
