These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Analysis of etiological factors involved in noncarious cervical lesions]. Tomasik M Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2006; 52(3):125-36. PubMed ID: 17385359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Class V lesion--aetiology and restoration. Tyas MJ Aust Dent J; 1995 Jun; 40(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 7661762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contemporary concepts in the pathogenesis of the Class V non-carious lesion. Burke FJ; Whitehead SA; McCaughey AD Dent Update; 1995; 22(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 7664969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A study of the classification and treatment of noncarious cervical lesions by general practitioners. Lyttle HA; Sidhu N; Smyth B J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Mar; 79(3):342-6. PubMed ID: 9553890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examining the prevalence and characteristics of abfractionlike cervical lesions in a population of U.S. veterans. Piotrowski BT; Gillette WB; Hancock EB J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Dec; 132(12):1694-701; quiz 1726-7. PubMed ID: 11780988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non carious cervical lesions. A review. Ceruti P; Menicucci G; Mariani GD; Pittoni D; Gassino G Minerva Stomatol; 2006; 55(1-2):43-57. PubMed ID: 16495872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions. Sidhu SK Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 8272493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An assessment of stress analyses in the theory of abfraction. Litonjua LA; Andreana S; Patra AK; Cohen RE Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(3):311-21. PubMed ID: 15299243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Adhesive techniques in the treatment of tooth wear due to bruxism]. Roeters J; Stel M Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Jul; 107(7):308-11. PubMed ID: 11385788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Epidemiological evaluation of the multifactorial aetiology of abfractions. Bernhardt O; Gesch D; Schwahn C; Mack F; Meyer G; John U; Kocher T J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 33(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 16409512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of noncarious cervical lesion size and occlusal wear in a single adult over a 14-year time span. Pintado MR; Delong R; Ko CC; Sakaguchi RL; Douglas WH J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 11044852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year perspective. Grippo JO; Simring M; Coleman TA J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Feb; 24(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 22296690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations. Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]