89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8620978)
1. [Comparative evaluation of different instruments for root canal preparation tested on extracted human teeth III. Study of sonic and ultrasonic instruments].
Dobó NC; Bartha K; Bernáth M; Szabó J
Fogorv Sz; 1996 Mar; 89(3):75-84. PubMed ID: 8620978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of seven instruments in shaping the root canal in vitro.
Nagy CD; Bartha K; Bernáth M; Verdes E; Szabó J
Int Endod J; 1997 Mar; 30(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 10332246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of root canal morphology on canal shape following instrumentation using different techniques.
Nagy CD; Bartha K; Bernáth M; Verdes E; Szabó J
Int Endod J; 1997 Mar; 30(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 10332247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [In vitro comparative study of instruments for root canal preparation. IV. Correlations between the original shape of the root canal and the asymmetry resulting from the preparation].
Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
Fogorv Sz; 1996 Jan; 89(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 8713616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [In vitro comparison of instruments for root canal preparation. III. Study of the instruments from the viewpoint of shaping asymmetry].
Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
Fogorv Sz; 1995 Oct; 88(10):319-29. PubMed ID: 8521999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of root canal preparation with the automated Excalibur endodontic handpiece.
Hülsmann M; Gambal A; Bahr R
Clin Oral Investig; 1999 Jun; 3(2):70-8. PubMed ID: 10803114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
Cheung GS; Chan AW
J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two endodontic handpieces during the preparation of root canals in extracted human teeth.
Smith RB; Edmunds DH
Int Endod J; 1998 Jan; 31(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 9823125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Bürklein S; Börjes L; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 23998461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of hand, sonic and ultrasonic instrumentation on the shape of curved root canals.
Tang MP; Stock CJ
Int Endod J; 1989 Mar; 22(2):55-63. PubMed ID: 2599662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F
J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Bürklein S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals.
Suter B; Lussi A; Sequeira P
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 15667633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
