These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8621298)
1. Dose to contralateral breast: a comparison of four primary breast irradiation techniques. Kelly CA; Wang XY; Chu JC; Hartsell WF Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Feb; 34(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 8621298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose to the contralateral breast: a comparison of two techniques using the enhanced dynamic wedge versus a standard wedge. Warlick WB; O'Rear JH; Earley L; Moeller JH; Gaffney DK; Leavitt DD Med Dosim; 1997; 22(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 9307948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the dose to the contralateral breast when using a dynamic wedge versus a regular wedge. Weides CD; Mok EC; Chang WC; Findley DO; Shostak CA Med Dosim; 1995; 20(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 8703326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A mobile shield to reduce scatter radiation to the contralateral breast during radiotherapy for breast cancer: preclinical results. Sohn JW; Macklis R; Suh JH; Kupelian P Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(5):1037-41. PubMed ID: 10192352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of contralateral breast doses from 1/2 beam block and isocentric treatment techniques for patients treated with primary breast irradiation with 60CO. Tercilla O; Krasin F; Lawn-Tsao L Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1989 Jul; 17(1):205-10. PubMed ID: 2745194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multileaf field-in-field forward-planned intensity-modulated dose compensation for whole-breast irradiation is associated with reduced contralateral breast dose: a phantom model comparison. Borghero YO; Salehpour M; McNeese MD; Stovall M; Smith SA; Johnson J; Perkins GH; Strom EA; Oh JL; Kirsner SM; Woodward WA; Yu TK; Buchholz TA Radiother Oncol; 2007 Mar; 82(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17157944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment and minimization of contralateral breast dose for conventional and intensity modulated breast radiotherapy. Burmeister J; Alvarado N; Way S; McDermott P; Bossenberger T; Jaenisch H; Patel R; Washington T Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18262117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of a dynamic wedge in the medial tangential field upon the contralateral breast dose. McParland BJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Dec; 19(6):1515-20. PubMed ID: 2262375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contralateral breast dose after whole-breast irradiation: an analysis by treatment technique. Williams TM; Moran JM; Hsu SH; Marsh R; Yanke B; Fraass BA; Pierce LJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):2079-85. PubMed ID: 21489713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simple shielding reduces dose to the contralateral breast during prone breast cancer radiotherapy. Goyal U; Locke A; Smith-Raymond L; Georgiev GN Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 26994826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose to contralateral breast--a comparative study. Brooks PS Med Dosim; 1995; 20(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 8703328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared to conventional tangential fields for primary breast irradiation. Bhatnagar AK; Brandner E; Sonnik D; Wu A; Kalnicki S; Deutsch M; Heron DE Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Mar; 96(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16244787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation dose to contralateral breast during treatment of breast malignancy by radiotherapy. Chougule A J Cancer Res Ther; 2007; 3(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 17998712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose to the contralateral breast due to primary breast irradiation. Fraass BA; Roberson PL; Lichter AS Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1985 Mar; 11(3):485-97. PubMed ID: 3972661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared to conventional tangential fields for primary breast irradiation: initial report. Bhatnagar AK; Brandner E; Sonnik D; Wu A; Kalnicki S; Deutsch M; Heron DE Cancer J; 2004; 10(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 15701270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A mono isocentric technique for breast and regional nodal therapy using dual asymmetric jaws. Klein EE; Taylor M; Michaletz-Lorenz M; Zoeller D; Umfleet W Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Feb; 28(3):753-60. PubMed ID: 8113122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of different intensity modulation treatment techniques for tangential breast irradiation. Chang SX; Deschesne KM; Cullip TJ; Parker SA; Earnhart J Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Dec; 45(5):1305-14. PubMed ID: 10613327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of radiation dose delivered by cone beam CT and tomosynthesis employed for setup of external breast irradiation. Winey B; Zygmanski P; Lyatskaya Y Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 19235385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience. Kestin LL; Sharpe MB; Frazier RC; Vicini FA; Yan D; Matter RC; Martinez AA; Wong JW Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1559-68. PubMed ID: 11121662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A planning comparison of dose patterns in organs at risk and predicted risk for radiation induced malignancy in the contralateral breast following radiation therapy of primary breast using conventional, IMRT and volumetric modulated arc treatment techniques. Johansen S; Cozzi L; Olsen DR Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 19169915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]