155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8622383)
1. Dealing with deception.
Lancet; 1996 Mar; 347(9005):843. PubMed ID: 8622383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Time to face up to research misconduct.
Smith R
BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Prevention and management of fraud--in theory.
Riis P
J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 8308472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives.
Chantler C; Chantler S
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters.
Farthing MJ
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Honest advice from Denmark.
Riis P
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1733. PubMed ID: 9652924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Whistle blowing and countersuits: the President's Commission and fraudulent research.
Shannon TA
IRB; 1981; 3(7):6-7. PubMed ID: 11649398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter.
Goldbeck-Wood S
BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1252. PubMed ID: 11644976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity.
Rennie D
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1726-8. PubMed ID: 9614029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
Farthing MJ
Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Call for research misconduct agency.
White C
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
Lang S
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical and scientific fraud.
Robinson RG
N Z Med J; 1994 Jun; 107(979):216-7. PubMed ID: 8208480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Editors seek ways to cope with fraud.
Williams N
Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5341):1221. PubMed ID: 9411745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud.
Abbott A
Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6722):13-7. PubMed ID: 10078516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public.
Smith R
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1686-7. PubMed ID: 9614011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research.
Wells F
Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain?
Lock S
BMJ; 1988 Dec; 297(6662):1531-5. PubMed ID: 3147062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Misconduct in research. Misconduct is not reported in biomedical journals in France.
Maisonneuve H
BMJ; 1996 Jul; 313(7049):109. PubMed ID: 8688718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
