These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8623066)

  • 21. A comparison of the Minerva and halo jackets for stabilization of the cervical spine.
    Benzel EC; Hadden TA; Saulsbery CM
    J Neurosurg; 1989 Mar; 70(3):411-4. PubMed ID: 2915248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Bracing in Spinal Immobilization: Precise Assessment of Gross, Intersegmental, and Segmental Spinal Motion Restriction by a 3D Kinematic System.
    Lang G; Hirschmüller A; Patermann S; Eichelberger P; Strohm P; Baur H; Südkamp NP; Herget GW
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e128-e146. PubMed ID: 29729467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of the Sheffield Support Snood, an innovative cervical orthosis designed for people affected by neck muscle weakness.
    Pancani S; Rowson J; Tindale W; Heron N; Langley J; McCarthy AD; Quinn A; Reed H; Stanton A; Shaw PJ; McDermott CJ; Mazzà C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():201-6. PubMed ID: 26673978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Proper fitting of the cervical orthosis.
    Fisher SV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1978 Nov; 59(11):505-7. PubMed ID: 727937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the effectiveness of different cervical immobilization collars.
    McCabe JB; Nolan DJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1986 Jan; 15(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 3942357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effectiveness of various cervical orthoses. An in vivo comparison of the mechanical stability provided by several widely used models.
    Sandler AJ; Dvorak J; Humke T; Grob D; Daniels W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1624-9. PubMed ID: 8839463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Study of low-temperature thermoplastic modified custom-molded cervical orthosis for cervical spine fixation.
    Lau YC; Chang RK; Cheng YC; Chang GL; Chou YL; Leong CP; Wong MK
    J Spinal Disord; 1994 Dec; 7(6):504-9. PubMed ID: 7873848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of neck movement in the soft cervical collar and rigid cervical brace in healthy subjects.
    Whitcroft KL; Massouh L; Amirfeyz R; Bannister GC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 Feb; 34(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 21334544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Kinematics of the upper cervical spine in rotation: in vivo three-dimensional analysis.
    Ishii T; Mukai Y; Hosono N; Sakaura H; Nakajima Y; Sato Y; Sugamoto K; Yoshikawa H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):E139-44. PubMed ID: 15087810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cervical orthoses effect on cervical spine motion: roentgenographic and goniometric method of study.
    Fisher SV; Bowar JF; Awad EA; Gullickson G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1977 Mar; 58(3):109-15. PubMed ID: 843201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Kinematic magnetic resonance imaging of the upper cervical spine using a novel positioning device.
    Karhu JO; Parkkola RK; Komu ME; Kormano MJ; Koskinen SK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(19):2046-56. PubMed ID: 10528383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An evaluation of cervical orthoses in limiting hyperextension and lateral flexion in football.
    Hovis WD; Limbird TJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Jul; 26(7):872-6. PubMed ID: 7934761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
    Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cervical orthoses: a guide to their selection and use.
    Johnson RM; Owen JR; Hart DL; Callahan RA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1981; (154):34-45. PubMed ID: 7471583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Functional anatomy of the head-neck movement system of quadrupedal and bipedal mammals.
    Graf W; de Waele C; Vidal PP
    J Anat; 1995 Feb; 186 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):55-74. PubMed ID: 7649818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Compatibility of cervical spine braces with MR imaging: a study of nine nonferrous devices.
    Clayman DA; Murakami ME; Vines FS
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1990; 11(2):385-90. PubMed ID: 2107723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of wearing a restrictive neck brace on driver performance.
    Barry CJ; Smith D; Lennarson P; Jermeland J; Darling W; Stierman L; Rizzo M; Traynelis VC
    Neurosurgery; 2003 Jul; 53(1):98-101; discussion 102. PubMed ID: 12823878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stabilization of 2-column thoracolumbar fractures with orthoses: a cadaver model.
    Rubery PT; Brown R; Prasarn M; Small J; Conrad B; Horodyski M; Rechtine G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):E270-5. PubMed ID: 23211532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cervical spine overflexion in a halo orthosis contributes to complete upper airway obstruction during awake bronchoscopic intubation: a case report.
    White AN; Wong DT; Goldstein CL; Wong J
    Can J Anaesth; 2015 Mar; 62(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 25467754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of halo-vest components on stabilizing the injured cervical spine.
    Ivancic PC; Beauchman NN; Tweardy L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 19139667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.