These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8623084)

  • 1. On the measurement of the effective linear attenuation coefficient mueff in 60Co wedge fields.
    Zaránd P; Polgár I
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1996 Apr; 172(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 8623084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dependency of wedge factors on field size and depth in megavoltage beams.
    Avadhani JS; Pradhan AS; Sankar A; Viswanathan PS
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1996 Nov; 172(11):626-30. PubMed ID: 8946032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design and comparison of wedge shaped midline block with rectangular block used in early stage cervical cancers.
    Avadhani JS; Deshpande DD; Pradhan AS; Viswanathan PS; Shrivastava SK; Dinshaw KA
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1996 Dec; 172(12):676-80. PubMed ID: 8972752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The estimation of the absorbed dose with wedge fields].
    Ferri A; Ruggeri R
    Radiol Med; 1997 Oct; 94(4):385-7. PubMed ID: 9465247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte carlo dose calculations in conventional thorax fields for 60Co photons.
    Mesbahi A; Allahverdi M; Gheraati H
    Radiat Med; 2005 Aug; 23(5):341-50. PubMed ID: 16342907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of electron beam obliquity on lateral buildup ratio: a Monte Carlo dosimetry evaluation.
    Chow JC; Grigorov GN
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3965-77. PubMed ID: 17664588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wedge factor changes with depth and field size on a linear accelerator with a motorized wedge.
    Raffaele L; Settineri N; Pergolizzi S; D'Angelo A
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):304-6. PubMed ID: 7501838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An interactive program to calculate the treatment time for 60Co single beam, opposing beam, and rotational beam radiation therapy.
    Liu NH; Raeside DE; Miller MP
    Radiol Technol; 1982; 53(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 6927771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinic based transfer of the N(D,W)(60Co) calibration coefficient using a linear accelerator.
    Abdel-Rahman W; Evans MD; Serré L; McCaffrey JP; Podgorsak EB; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):929-38. PubMed ID: 19378753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurements of primary off-axis ratios in wedged asymmetric photon fields: a formalism for dose and monitor unit calculations.
    Mihailidis DN; Tomara PD; Gibbons JP
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2003-14. PubMed ID: 15843733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptation of telecobalt unit for stereotactic irradiation.
    Singh IR; Ravindran BP; Ayyangar KM
    Med Dosim; 2007; 32(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 17317536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dosimetry in translation total body irradiation technique: a computer treatment planning approach and an experimental study concerning lung sparing.
    Zabatis Ch; Koligliatis T; Xenofos S; Pistevou K; Psarakos K; Haritanti A; Beroukas K
    J BUON; 2008; 13(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18555474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
    Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wedge factor dependence on depth and field size for various beam energies using symmetric and half-collimated asymmetric jaw settings.
    Niroomand-Rad A; Haleem M; Rodgers J; Obcemea C
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(6):1445-50. PubMed ID: 1461208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Refined gypsum effective attenuation coefficients for Co-60, 6 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV x-rays.
    Glasgow GP; Dogan N; Sethi A; Stanton J
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jan; 48(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12564501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recommendations for measurement of tray and wedge factors for high energy photons.
    Sharma SC; Johnson MW
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):573-5. PubMed ID: 8058025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Independent calculations to validate monitor units from ADAC treatment planning system.
    Ayyangar KM; Saw CB; Gearheart D; Shen B; Thompson R
    Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 12804704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of the restricted dose mean LET outside the primary beam of a 60Co radiotherapy unit.
    Makrigiorgos G; Antonadou D
    Radiat Res; 1987 Apr; 110(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 3562790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
    Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absolute dose calculations for Monte Carlo simulations of radiotherapy beams.
    Popescu IA; Shaw CP; Zavgorodni SF; Beckham WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(14):3375-92. PubMed ID: 16177516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.