215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8624196)
1. A prospective study of carbon dioxide-digital subtraction vs standard contrast arteriography in the evaluation of the renal arteries.
Schreier DZ; Weaver FA; Frankhouse J; Papanicolaou G; Shore E; Yellin AE; Harvey F
Arch Surg; 1996 May; 131(5):503-7; discussion 507-8. PubMed ID: 8624196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective study of carbon dioxide digital subtraction versus standard contrast arteriography in the detection of endoleaks in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs.
Huang SG; Woo K; Moos JM; Han S; Lew WK; Chao A; Hamilton A; Ochoa C; Hood DB; Rowe VL; Weaver FA
Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Jan; 27(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 23257072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multidetector-row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA.
Fraioli F; Catalano C; Bertoletti L; Danti M; Fanelli F; Napoli A; Cavacece M; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 16683091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA.
Soulez G; Pasowicz M; Benea G; Grazioli L; Niedmann JP; Konopka M; Douek PC; Morana G; Schaefer FK; Vanzulli A; Bluemke DA; Maki JH; Prince MR; Schneider G; Ballarati C; Coulden R; Wasser MN; McCauley TR; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):273-85. PubMed ID: 18372471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Renal artery imaging: a prospective comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with conventional angiography.
Kim D; Porter DH; Brown R; Crivello MS; Silva P; Leeming BW
Angiology; 1991 May; 42(5):345-57. PubMed ID: 2035886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [CO2 angiography of transplanted kidneys].
Lorch H; Steinhoff J; Fricke L; Wolny A; Kagel C; Weiss HD; Zwaan M
Rontgenpraxis; 2003; 55(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 12650035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated carbon dioxide digital angiography for lower-limb arterial disease evaluation: safety assessment and comparison with standard iodinated contrast media angiography.
Scalise F; Novelli E; Auguadro C; Casali V; Manfredi M; Zannoli R
J Invasive Cardiol; 2015 Jan; 27(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 25589696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital subtraction angiography of the renal arteries. Prospective comparison with conventional arteriography.
Clark RA; Alexander ES
Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6339438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of main renal artery stenosis using phase-contrast cine MR angiography.
Silverman JM; Friedman ML; Van Allan RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1131-7. PubMed ID: 8615257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gadolinium as a nonnephrotoxic contrast agent for catheter-based arteriographic evaluation of renal arteries in patients with azotemia.
Ailawadi G; Stanley JC; Williams DM; Dimick JB; Henke PK; Upchurch GR
J Vasc Surg; 2003 Feb; 37(2):346-52. PubMed ID: 12563205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utilization of Carbon Dioxide Angiography and Percutaneous Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis.
Hasjim BJ; Fujitani RM; Chen SL; Donayre C; Kuo IJ; Raza A; Reddy U; Ichii H; Kabutey NK
Ann Vasc Surg; 2020 May; 65():10-16. PubMed ID: 31712187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multislice CT angiography in renal artery stent evaluation: prospective comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.
Raza SA; Chughtai AR; Wahba M; Cowling MG; Taube D; Wright AR
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004; 27(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15109221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Balloon-Occluded Carbon Dioxide Gas Angiography for Internal Iliac Arteriography and Intervention.
Kishino M; Nakaminato S; Kitazume Y; Miyasaka N; Kudo T; Saida Y; Tateishi U
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2018 Jul; 41(7):1106-1111. PubMed ID: 29666905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive diagnosis of renal artery stenosis by spiral computed tomography angiography.
Olbricht CJ; Paul K; Prokop M; Chavan A; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Jandeleit K; Koch KM; Galanski M
Kidney Int; 1995 Oct; 48(4):1332-7. PubMed ID: 8569096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography.
Bakker J; Beek FJ; Beutler JJ; Hene RJ; de Kort GA; de Lange EE; Moons KG; Mali WP
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 9577501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities: carbon dioxide versus iodinated contrast material.
Oliva VL; Denbow N; Thérasse E; Common AA; Harel C; Giroux MF; Soulez G
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Jun; 10(6):723-31. PubMed ID: 10392939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
Rountas C; Vlychou M; Vassiou K; Liakopoulos V; Kapsalaki E; Koukoulis G; Fezoulidis IV; Stefanidis I
Ren Fail; 2007; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.
Thornton J; O'Callaghan J; Walshe J; O'Brien E; Varghese JC; Lee MJ
Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(5):930-4. PubMed ID: 10369993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography.
Kaatee R; Beek FJ; de Lange EE; van Leeuwen MS; Smits HF; van der Ven PJ; Beutler JJ; Mali WP
Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 9314973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
