These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8624232)

  • 1. Effect of a clamp on toothbrush bristle deterioration.
    Schneider P; Musselman R; Sarkar NK
    J Clin Dent; 1995; 6(4):198-201. PubMed ID: 8624232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory evaluations of elmex inter X toothbrushes for interproximal access efficacy and posterior tooth surface cleaning.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 12518499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest complete toothbrush versus the Current Crest complete toothbrush, the Colgate Precision toothbrush and the Oral-B P40 toothbrush.
    Volpenhein DW; Handel SE; Hughes TJ; Wild J
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9238881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of powered electric toothbrushes: relative degree of bristle end-rounding.
    McLey L; Boyd RL; Sarker S
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(3 Spec No):86-90. PubMed ID: 9238892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of the percent acceptable end-rounded bristles: Butler G.U.M., Colgate Plus, Crest Complete, and Reach.
    Dellerman PA; Burkett TA; Kreyling KM
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 7999288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative efficacy of two battery-powered toothbrushes on dental plaque removal.
    Ruhlman CD; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):95-9. PubMed ID: 11887517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of tapered-end toothbrush bristles regarding efficacy of access to occlusal fissures.
    Hotta M; Sekine I; Imade S; Sano A
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(6):225-7. PubMed ID: 12518495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of different toothpaste abrasives on the bristle end-rounding quality of toothbrushes.
    de Oliveira GJ; de Aveiro JM; Pavone C; Marcantonio RA
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 Feb; 13(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 24661364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the end-rounding of nylon bristles in commercial toothbrushes: Crest Complete and Oral-B.
    Mulry CA; Dellerman PA; Ludwa RJ; White DJ; Wild JE
    J Clin Dent; 1992; 3(2):47-50. PubMed ID: 1524685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation into the effect of three months' clinical wear on toothbrush efficacy: results from two independent studies.
    Conforti NJ; Cordero RE; Liebman J; Bowman JP; Putt MS; Kuebler DS; Davidson KR; Cugini M; Warren PR
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 12723100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in abrasion capacity of four soft toothbrushes.
    Teche FV; Paranhos HF; Motta MF; Zaniquelli O; Tirapelli C
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2011 Nov; 9(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 21356032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toothbrush bristle wear and adherence of Streptococcus mutans.
    Goldsmith RN; Shey Z; Houpt MI; Fine D; Schreiner H; Greenberg B
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 17688023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of toothpaste slurry abrasivity and toothbrush filament stiffness on abrasion of eroded enamel - an in vitro study.
    Wiegand A; Schwerzmann M; Sener B; Magalhaes AC; Roos M; Ziebolz D; Imfeld T; Attin T
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Aug; 66(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 18622830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of toothbrush bristles' deterioration used by preschool children.
    Garbin CA; Garbin AJ; dos Santos KT; de Lourdes Carvalho M; Lima DC
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2009 Nov; 7(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 19832916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The measurement of toothbrush wear.
    Rawls HR; Mkwayi-Tulloch NJ; Casella R; Cosgrove R
    J Dent Res; 1989 Dec; 68(12):1781-5. PubMed ID: 2600261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of a rippled bristles toothbrush and a flat manual toothbrush.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):82-4. PubMed ID: 8003238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Manual toothbrush wear and consequences on plaque removal.
    Muller-Bolla M; Lupi-Pégurier L; Bertrand MF; Velly AM
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(3):73-8. PubMed ID: 17913000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative clinical study in plaque removal efficacy of a new sonic toothbrush (Float-Brush) with floating bristle action.
    Ojima M; Shizukuishi S; Matsuo T; Kanesaki N; Hanioka T
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(2):42-4. PubMed ID: 12723103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An electron microscopic comparison of bristle end-rounding of three commercial toothbrushes.
    Rawls HR; Smith NK; Lentz DL; Cobb GW; Bailey MS
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):96-100. PubMed ID: 8003240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relative cleaning effectiveness of manual and powered toothbrushes.
    Hunt SA
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):211-4. PubMed ID: 12518492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.