377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8627839)
1. Outcomes of initial surveillance of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and negative nodes.
Theodorescu D; Russo P; Zhang ZF; Morash C; Fair WR
J Urol; 1996 May; 155(5):1626-31. PubMed ID: 8627839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Marconnet L; Rigaud J; Bouchot O
J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2227-32. PubMed ID: 20399455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-institutional long-term experience with conservative surgery for invasive penile carcinoma.
Bissada NK; Yakout HH; Fahmy WE; Gayed MS; Touijer AK; Greene GF; Hanash KA
J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):500-2. PubMed ID: 12544296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and palpable inguinal nodes.
Heyns CF; Theron PD
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 18410439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of morphologic features and outcome of resected recurrent and nonrecurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a study of 81 cases.
Chaux A; Reuter V; Lezcano C; Velazquez EF; Torres J; Cubilla AL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Sep; 33(9):1299-306. PubMed ID: 19471153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accurate staging of carcinoma of the penis in men with nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes by modified inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Parra RO
J Urol; 1996 Feb; 155(2):560-3. PubMed ID: 8558660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymphatic and vascular embolizations are independent predictive variables of inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord Est (Northeast Uro-Oncological Group) Penile Cancer data base data.
Ficarra V; Zattoni F; Cunico SC; Galetti TP; Luciani L; Fandella A; Guazzieri S; Maruzzi D; Sava T; Siracusano S; Pilloni S; Tasca A; Martignoni G; Gardiman M; Tardanico R; Zambolin T; Cisternino A; Artibani W;
Cancer; 2005 Jun; 103(12):2507-16. PubMed ID: 15856474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extended lymphadenectomy in penile cancer.
Pompeo AC
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():30-6; discussion 97-8. PubMed ID: 15780162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association between lymph node density and disease specific survival in patients with penile cancer.
Svatek RS; Munsell M; Kincaid JM; Hegarty P; Slaton JW; Busby JE; Gaston KE; Spiess PE; Pagliaro LC; Tamboli P; Pettaway CA
J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2721-7. PubMed ID: 19837433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Therapeutic implications of lymph nodal spread in lateral T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.
Andrews SJ; Williams BT; DePriest PD; Gallion HH; Hunter JE; Buckley SL; Kryscio RJ; van Nagell JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Oct; 55(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 7959264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Melanoma of the penis, scrotum and male urethra: a 40-year single institution experience.
Sánchez-Ortiz R; Huang SF; Tamboli P; Prieto VG; Hester G; Pettaway CA
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1958-65. PubMed ID: 15879790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morbidity of prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy with saphenous vein preservation for squamous cell penile carcinoma.
Milathianakis C; Bogdanos J; Karamanolakis D
Int J Urol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):776-8. PubMed ID: 16174057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cancer of the penis--a review of 50 patients.
Heyns CF; van Vollenhoven P; Steenkamp JW; Allen FJ
S Afr J Surg; 1997 Aug; 35(3):120-4. PubMed ID: 9429328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer.
Protzel C; Alcaraz A; Horenblas S; Pizzocaro G; Zlotta A; Hakenberg OW
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1075-88. PubMed ID: 19264390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinically node-negative penile cancer versus radical inguinal lymphadenectomy: a comparative study.
Perdonà S; Autorino R; De Sio M; Di Lorenzo G; Gallo L; Damiano R; D'Armiento M; Gallo A
Urology; 2005 Dec; 66(6):1282-6. PubMed ID: 16360457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prophylactic lymphadenectomy vs observation vs inguinal biopsy in node-negative patients with invasive carcinoma of the penis.
Ravi R
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1993 Feb; 23(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 8459642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: a new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Ornellas AA; Molina WR; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):953-7; discussion 958. PubMed ID: 17296386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Carcinoma of the penis. What to do with the regional lymph nodes?].
Virseda Rodríguez JA; Salinas Sánchez A; Hernández Millan I
Arch Esp Urol; 1994 May; 47(4):349-62. PubMed ID: 8053721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Treatment of the regional lymph nodes in squamous carcinoma of the penis].
Bernardo N; Scorticati C; Holst P; Soldano M; De Lasa T; Suárez P; López M; Bencardino F; Sotero Falco E; Coste Delvecchio F; Rendón F
Arch Esp Urol; 1996 Oct; 49(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 9065278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The value of biopsy of the inguinal lymph nodes in patients with epidermoid carcinoma of the penis].
Ornellas AA; Correia Seixas AL; Wisnescky A; Campos F; Rangel de Moraes J
Prog Urol; 1995 Sep; 5(4):544-7. PubMed ID: 7581505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
