333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8628873)
1. Angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma: US differentiation.
Siegel CL; Middleton WD; Teefey SA; McClennan BL
Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):789-93. PubMed ID: 8628873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Criteria for ultrasound differentiation of small angiomyolipomas (< or = 3 cm) and renal cell carcinomas].
Zebedin D; Kammerhuber F; Uggowitzer MM; Szolar DH
Rofo; 1998 Dec; 169(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 9930217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hyperechoic renal tumors: anechoic rim and intratumoral cysts in US differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from angiomyolipoma.
Yamashita Y; Ueno S; Makita O; Ogata I; Hatanaka Y; Watanabe O; Takahashi M
Radiology; 1993 Jul; 188(1):179-82. PubMed ID: 8511293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating small renal carcinoma and angiomyolipoma.
Chen L; Wang L; Diao X; Qian W; Fang L; Pang Y; Zhan J; Chen Y
Biosci Trends; 2015 Aug; 9(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 26268710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma: the initial study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Lu Q; Wang W; Huang B; Li C; Li C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1896-901. PubMed ID: 22906749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Kim JY; Kim JK; Kim N; Cho KS
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 18094264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do all non-calcified echogenic renal lesions found on ultrasound need further evaluation with CT?
Farrelly C; Delaney H; McDermott R; Malone D
Abdom Imaging; 2008; 33(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 17849156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tuberose sclerosis complex: analysis of growth rates aids differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from atypical or minimal-fat-containing angiomyolipoma.
Patel U; Simpson E; Kingswood JC; Saggar-Malik AK
Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):665-73; discussion 663-4. PubMed ID: 16038693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Small echogenic renal masses: how often is computed tomography used to confirm the sonographic suspicion of angiomyolipoma?
Ikeda AK; Korobkin M; Platt JF; Cohan RH; Ellis JH
Urology; 1995 Sep; 46(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 7660504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for small renal masses.
Oh TH; Lee YH; Seo IY
Korean J Urol; 2014 Sep; 55(9):587-92. PubMed ID: 25237460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT negative attenuation pixel distribution and texture analysis for detection of fat in small angiomyolipoma on unenhanced CT.
Takahashi N; Takeuchi M; Sasaguri K; Leng S; Froemming A; Kawashima A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jun; 41(6):1142-51. PubMed ID: 27015866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fat poor angiomyolipoma differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion.
Chen C; Kang Q; Xu B; Shi Z; Guo H; Wei Q; Lu Y; Wu X
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 May; 43(5):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 28828638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma with hounsfield unit thresholds: effect of size of region of interest and nephrographic phase imaging.
Davenport MS; Neville AM; Ellis JH; Cohan RH; Chaudhry HS; Leder RA
Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 21555349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subjective and objective heterogeneity scores for differentiating small renal masses using contrast-enhanced CT.
Leng S; Takahashi N; Gomez Cardona D; Kitajima K; McCollough B; Li Z; Kawashima A; Leibovich BC; McCollough CH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 28025654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY
Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angiomyolipoma being surgically excised for presumed kidney carcinoma.
Hou W; Xiao H; Liu G; Ji Z
Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jul; 47(7):1037-43. PubMed ID: 25940032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of T1-Weighted MRI to Detect Intratumoral Hemorrhage Within Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma as a Feature Differentiating From Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat.
Murray CA; Quon M; McInnes MD; van der Pol CB; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Sep; 207(3):585-91. PubMed ID: 27275530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
