These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8628933)
1. [Magnetic resonance and computed tomography compared in the staging of rhinosinusal neoplasms. A cost-effectiveness evaluation]. Maroldi R; Farina D; Battaglia G; Maculotti P; Chiesa A Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 8628933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Definition of the T parameter in nasosinusal neoplasms: a CT-MR comparison]. Krengli M; Avataneo T; Orecchia R; Pisani P; Negri G; Gandini G Radiol Med; 1993; 86(1-2):89-94. PubMed ID: 8346361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-line (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with carcinoma of the sinus/nasal area and orbit. Wild D; Eyrich GK; Ciernik IF; Stoeckli SJ; Schuknecht B; Goerres GW J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 34(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16343913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of CT and MRI in diagnosis of tumors of the nasopharynx, the inner nose and the paranasal sinuses]. Held P; Breit A Bildgebung; 1994 Sep; 61(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 7987060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of extensions of sinonasal mass lesions by computerized tomography scan. Annam V; Shenoy AM; Raghuram P; Annam V; Kurien JM Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 20448382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rethinking orbital imaging establishing guidelines for interpreting orbital imaging studies and evaluating their predictive value in patients with orbital tumors. Ben Simon GJ; Annunziata CC; Fink J; Villablanca P; McCann JD; Goldberg RA Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2196-207. PubMed ID: 16325712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in the preoperative staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Roh JL; Yeo NK; Kim JS; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY Oral Oncol; 2007 Oct; 43(9):887-93. PubMed ID: 17207656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of inverted papilloma: differential diagnosis with malignant sinonasal tumors. Maroldi R; Farina D; Palvarini L; Lombardi D; Tomenzoli D; Nicolai P Am J Rhinol; 2004; 18(5):305-10. PubMed ID: 15586802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Value of MRI and computerized tomography scanner in oro-buccopharyngeal cancers with bone invasion]. Nallet E; Piekarski JD; Bensimon JL; Ameline E; Barry B; Gehanno P Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1999 Oct; 116(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 10572589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative renal tumor evaluation by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging: Staging and detection of multifocality. Huang GJ; Israel G; Berman A; Taneja SS Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 15351569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single modality and multimodality treatment of nasal and paranasal sinuses cancer: a single institution experience of 229 patients. Guntinas-Lichius O; Kreppel MP; Stuetzer H; Semrau R; Eckel HE; Mueller RP Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 33(2):222-8. PubMed ID: 17127030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer]. Pöpperl G; Lang S; Dagdelen O; Jäger L; Tiling R; Hahn K; Tatsch K Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 12063600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Influences of magnetic resonance imaging on the staging system of nasopharyngeal carcinoma]. Sun Y; Mao YP; Ma J; Huang Y; Tang LL; Wang Y; Liu LZ; Lu TX Ai Zheng; 2007 Feb; 26(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 17298745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic assessment of inverted papilloma. Head CS; Sercarz JA; Luu Q; Collins J; Blackwell KE Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 May; 127(5):515-20. PubMed ID: 17453478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging of sinonasal tumors. Brown JH; DeLuca SA Am Fam Physician; 1992 Apr; 45(4):1653-6. PubMed ID: 1558041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Endosonography, CT and MRI in the diagnostic concept of rectal carcinoma]. Kienle P; Glaser F; Kuntz C; Düx M; Herfarth C Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():477-9. PubMed ID: 9574187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective study of contrast-enhanced computed tomography, computed tomography during arterioportography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases for liver resection. Bhattacharjya S; Bhattacharjya T; Baber S; Tibballs JM; Watkinson AF; Davidson BR Br J Surg; 2004 Oct; 91(10):1361-9. PubMed ID: 15376205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative staging of rectal tumors: comparison of endorectal ultrasound, hydro-CT, and high-resolution endorectal MRI. Dinter DJ; Hofheinz RD; Hartel M; Kaehler GF; Neff W; Diehl SJ Onkologie; 2008 May; 31(5):230-5. PubMed ID: 18497511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Costs in follow-up of endovascularly repaired abdominal aortic aneurysms. Magnetic resonance imaging with MR angiography versus EUROSTAR protocols. Engellau L; Albrechtsson U; Höjgård S; Norgren L; Larsson EM Int Angiol; 2003 Mar; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12771854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]