188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8628933)
1. [Magnetic resonance and computed tomography compared in the staging of rhinosinusal neoplasms. A cost-effectiveness evaluation].
Maroldi R; Farina D; Battaglia G; Maculotti P; Chiesa A
Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 8628933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Definition of the T parameter in nasosinusal neoplasms: a CT-MR comparison].
Krengli M; Avataneo T; Orecchia R; Pisani P; Negri G; Gandini G
Radiol Med; 1993; 86(1-2):89-94. PubMed ID: 8346361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-line (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with carcinoma of the sinus/nasal area and orbit.
Wild D; Eyrich GK; Ciernik IF; Stoeckli SJ; Schuknecht B; Goerres GW
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 34(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16343913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of CT and MRI in diagnosis of tumors of the nasopharynx, the inner nose and the paranasal sinuses].
Held P; Breit A
Bildgebung; 1994 Sep; 61(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 7987060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of extensions of sinonasal mass lesions by computerized tomography scan.
Annam V; Shenoy AM; Raghuram P; Annam V; Kurien JM
Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 20448382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rethinking orbital imaging establishing guidelines for interpreting orbital imaging studies and evaluating their predictive value in patients with orbital tumors.
Ben Simon GJ; Annunziata CC; Fink J; Villablanca P; McCann JD; Goldberg RA
Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2196-207. PubMed ID: 16325712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in the preoperative staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Roh JL; Yeo NK; Kim JS; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Oral Oncol; 2007 Oct; 43(9):887-93. PubMed ID: 17207656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of inverted papilloma: differential diagnosis with malignant sinonasal tumors.
Maroldi R; Farina D; Palvarini L; Lombardi D; Tomenzoli D; Nicolai P
Am J Rhinol; 2004; 18(5):305-10. PubMed ID: 15586802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Value of MRI and computerized tomography scanner in oro-buccopharyngeal cancers with bone invasion].
Nallet E; Piekarski JD; Bensimon JL; Ameline E; Barry B; Gehanno P
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1999 Oct; 116(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 10572589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative renal tumor evaluation by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging: Staging and detection of multifocality.
Huang GJ; Israel G; Berman A; Taneja SS
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 15351569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single modality and multimodality treatment of nasal and paranasal sinuses cancer: a single institution experience of 229 patients.
Guntinas-Lichius O; Kreppel MP; Stuetzer H; Semrau R; Eckel HE; Mueller RP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 33(2):222-8. PubMed ID: 17127030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer].
Pöpperl G; Lang S; Dagdelen O; Jäger L; Tiling R; Hahn K; Tatsch K
Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 12063600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Influences of magnetic resonance imaging on the staging system of nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Sun Y; Mao YP; Ma J; Huang Y; Tang LL; Wang Y; Liu LZ; Lu TX
Ai Zheng; 2007 Feb; 26(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 17298745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic assessment of inverted papilloma.
Head CS; Sercarz JA; Luu Q; Collins J; Blackwell KE
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 May; 127(5):515-20. PubMed ID: 17453478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging of sinonasal tumors.
Brown JH; DeLuca SA
Am Fam Physician; 1992 Apr; 45(4):1653-6. PubMed ID: 1558041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Endosonography, CT and MRI in the diagnostic concept of rectal carcinoma].
Kienle P; Glaser F; Kuntz C; Düx M; Herfarth C
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():477-9. PubMed ID: 9574187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective study of contrast-enhanced computed tomography, computed tomography during arterioportography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases for liver resection.
Bhattacharjya S; Bhattacharjya T; Baber S; Tibballs JM; Watkinson AF; Davidson BR
Br J Surg; 2004 Oct; 91(10):1361-9. PubMed ID: 15376205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative staging of rectal tumors: comparison of endorectal ultrasound, hydro-CT, and high-resolution endorectal MRI.
Dinter DJ; Hofheinz RD; Hartel M; Kaehler GF; Neff W; Diehl SJ
Onkologie; 2008 May; 31(5):230-5. PubMed ID: 18497511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Costs in follow-up of endovascularly repaired abdominal aortic aneurysms. Magnetic resonance imaging with MR angiography versus EUROSTAR protocols.
Engellau L; Albrechtsson U; Höjgård S; Norgren L; Larsson EM
Int Angiol; 2003 Mar; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12771854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
