114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8629553)
21. Cytologic and histologic diagnosis and significance of controversial squamous lesions of the uterine cervix.
Duggan MA
Mod Pathol; 2000 Mar; 13(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 10757336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Follow up after an abnormal pap smear: time interval acceptable, nature of follow up leaves room for improvement].
Geertsen M; Bais AG; Beerman H; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Dec; 147(49):2430-4. PubMed ID: 14694554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Mayeaux EJ; Felmar E; Newkirk GR
Am Fam Physician; 1996 Aug; 54(2):456, 460-2, 465. PubMed ID: 8701831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Increased detection of clue cells in smears from cervical intraepithelial lesions with reduced expression of COX-2.
Figueiredo PG; Sarian LO; Tambascia JK; Simões JA; Rabelo-Santos SH; Discacciati MG; Derchain S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Oct; 36(10):705-9. PubMed ID: 18773440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: sensitivity of detection by cervical smear: will cytologic screening for adenocarcinoma in situ reduce incidence rates for adenocarcinoma.
Smith HO; Padilla LA
Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):319-22. PubMed ID: 12478677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Cyto ogical studies in women under age 30].
Kocsis Z; Topscher Z
Orv Hetil; 1974 May; 115(19):1114-6. PubMed ID: 4825521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Cervical cancer screening with pattern of pap smear. Review of multicenter studies.
Altaf FJ
Saudi Med J; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1498-502. PubMed ID: 17013471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Early detection of cancer in women.
Brown DC
Prim Care; 1976 Jun; 3(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 1047446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Cervical cancer screening and associated treatment costs in France].
Bergeron C; Breugelmans JG; Bouée S; Lorans C; Bénard S; Rémy V
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1036-42. PubMed ID: 17070085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A few funny cells.
Green B
Midwives Chron; 1982 Sep; 95(1136):332. PubMed ID: 6922399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Vaginal cytology. Study of sample models of subjects with carcinoma in situ and micro-invasive carcinoma].
Zanetta G; Bossi C; Gibelli B; Rossi A; Zocchi G; Rubino T
Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1981; 102(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 7247203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan.
Sung HY; Kearney KA; Miller M; Kinney W; Sawaya GF; Hiatt RA
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2283-9. PubMed ID: 10820350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cervical cytopathology reporting systems. Helping or hindering patient management?
Molodysky E; Bridges-Webb C
Aust Fam Physician; 1997 Jan; 26 Suppl 1():S7-11. PubMed ID: 9009029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Brdicka reaction in vaginal secretions. A possible diagnostic tool in cervical cancer.
Velázquez A; Hernández-Pérez O; Gómez P; Gallegos G; Rosado A
Arch Invest Med (Mex); 1988; 19(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 3228346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in 648 teenagers].
Gottardi G; Marzi MM; Zaninetti P; Gritti P; Baccolo M; Remotti G
Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1980; 101(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 7469266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions and severe cervical combined lesions: predictive value of the papanicolaou smear.
van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 15368312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Vaginal cytology in induced abortion].
Dossland S; Bergsjo P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1976 Jun; 96(16):937-8. PubMed ID: 936185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Conservatism versus radicalism in the diagnosis of cervical cancer.
Ahronheim JH
Mich Med; 1974 May; 73(14):261 passim. PubMed ID: 4825306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Human papillomavirus DNA detection in cervical specimens by hybrid capture: correlation with cytologic and histologic diagnoses of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.
Hall S; Lörincz A; Shah F; Sherman ME; Abbas F; Paull G; Kurman RJ; Shah KV
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 8812532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
