42 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8629554)
1. ASCUS and LSIL Pap smear. Results: triage considerations.
Ferris DG
Am Fam Physician; 1996 Mar; 53(4):1057-8, 1060, 1064 passim. PubMed ID: 8629554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Elevated levels of tetraploid cervical cells in human papillomavirus-positive Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Olaharski AJ; Eastmond DA
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 15211479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospective evaluation of cervical smears in women harbouring biopsy proven SIL.
Grabowska H; Nordesjö LO; Matuszkiewicz L
Pol J Pathol; 1998; 49(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 9810175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL cytology: use of qualitative assessment of p16INK4a positive cells to identify patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Wentzensen N; Bergeron C; Cas F; Vinokurova S; von Knebel Doeberitz M
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 17186505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ASCUS LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) conclusions reaffirmed: response to a November 2001 commentary.
Solomon D; Schiffman M; Tarone R
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Apr; 99(4):671-4. PubMed ID: 12039132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Significance of human papillomavirus test in triage of patients with atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance].
Zhao J; Zhou JN; Yang YJ; Liao QP
Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 22(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 19105350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).
Walker JL; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 16890545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison.
Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Follow-up of Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Howell LP; Davis RL
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8834072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of p16INK4a as a diagnostic tool in the triage of Pap smears demonstrating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Duncan L; Jacob S; Hubbard E
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 114(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 18186493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. HPV triage testing or repeat Pap smear for the management of atypical squamous cells (ASCUS) on Pap smear: is there evidence of process utility?
Howard K; Salkeld G; McCaffery K; Irwig L
Health Econ; 2008 May; 17(5):593-605. PubMed ID: 17764095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When the cervical Pap smear is positive.
Sinykin MB
Minn Med; 1966 Jul; 49(7):1095. PubMed ID: 5939748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The positive Pap smear.
Dockerty MB; Dahlin DC; Prem KA; D'Angio GJ
Minn Med; 1966 Jul; 49(7):1181-4. PubMed ID: 5942714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Concomitant Aspergillus Species Infection and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Diagnosed on Pap Smear.
Gupta P; Goyal S; Kaushal M
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2016; 32(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 24272933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Electronmicroscopic study of the vaginal desquamated cells].
Kawanishi H
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1967 Mar; 19(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 6070777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
