42 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8629554)
21. Does every little cell count? Don't "ASCUS".
Stoler MH
Cancer; 1999 Apr; 87(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 10227592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Cellular pattern of vaginal smears in mice with ascites tumors.
Roszel J; Koprowska I
Acta Cytol; 1967; 11(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 5230449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. How accurate is the pap test?
Daly JW
Med Times; 1971 Mar; 99(3):64-8 passim. PubMed ID: 5546004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Is the end of the Pap classification in sight?].
Lammes FB; van den Tweel JG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Jan; 134(2):51-3. PubMed ID: 2296323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Progression of borderline abnormalities on cervical smear testing.
Hussein KA; Parham DM
BMJ; 1992 Jun; 304(6843):1690-1. PubMed ID: 1633530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Progression of borderline abnormalities on cervical smear testing.
Ratcliffe MA; Dawson AA; Flannelly G
BMJ; 1992 Jun; 304(6843):1691. PubMed ID: 1633532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [On the definition of dyskaryosis].
Zinser HK
Gynaecologia; 1966; 161(3):221-3. PubMed ID: 5920784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Critical remarks on the dyskaryosis concept].
Hillemanns HG
Gynaecologia; 1966; 161(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 5920785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Clinical and histological considerations on so-called paratypia].
PALINSKA-WEESE Z; BOROWICZ K
Ginekol Pol; 1955; 26(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 14391602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. ASCUS LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) conclusions reaffirmed: response to a November 2001 commentary.
Solomon D; Schiffman M; Tarone R
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Apr; 99(4):671-4. PubMed ID: 12039132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. ASCUS and LSIL Pap smear. Results: triage considerations.
Ferris DG
Am Fam Physician; 1996 Mar; 53(4):1057-8, 1060, 1064 passim. PubMed ID: 8629554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Elevated levels of tetraploid cervical cells in human papillomavirus-positive Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Olaharski AJ; Eastmond DA
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 15211479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Retrospective evaluation of cervical smears in women harbouring biopsy proven SIL.
Grabowska H; Nordesjö LO; Matuszkiewicz L
Pol J Pathol; 1998; 49(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 9810175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL cytology: use of qualitative assessment of p16INK4a positive cells to identify patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Wentzensen N; Bergeron C; Cas F; Vinokurova S; von Knebel Doeberitz M
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 17186505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
