248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8629670)
1. The impact of disease severity on the informed consent process in clinical research.
Schaeffer MH; Krantz DS; Wichman A; Masur H; Reed E; Vinicky JK
Am J Med; 1996 Mar; 100(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 8629670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Therapeutic misconception in early phase gene transfer trials.
Henderson GE; Easter MM; Zimmer C; King NM; Davis AM; Rothschild BB; Churchill LR; Wilfond BS; Nelson DK
Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jan; 62(1):239-53. PubMed ID: 16000230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of repeated testing upon comprehension of informed consent materials by elderly volunteers.
Taub HA; Baker MT
Exp Aging Res; 1983; 9(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 6641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protocol review within the context of a research program.
Miller FG; Rosenstein DL
IRB; 1998; 20(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11657088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
Macklin R
IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.
Appelbaum PS; Roth LH; Lidz CW; Benson P; Winslade W
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Apr; 17(2):20-4. PubMed ID: 3294743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The right of subjects to see the protocol.
Veatch RM
IRB; 2002; 24(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 12737168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability.
Meade CD; Howser DM
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1992; 19(10):1523-8. PubMed ID: 1461766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis.
Kimmelman J; Palmour N
J Med Ethics; 2005 Apr; 31(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 15800361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes--chapter 7: Informed consent and xenotransplantation clinical trials.
Vanderpool HY
Xenotransplantation; 2009; 16(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 19799766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent in gerontology.
Glock RS; Goldim JR
Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2003 Jan; 13(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 17120359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials.
Lidz CW; Appelbaum PS; Grisso T; Renaud M
Soc Sci Med; 2004 May; 58(9):1689-97. PubMed ID: 14990370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of mood state on capacity to consent to research in patients with bipolar disorder.
Misra S; Socherman R; Park BS; Hauser P; Ganzini L
Bipolar Disord; 2008 Mar; 10(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 18271910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Limitations of informed consent for in utero gene transfer research: implications for investigators and institutional review boards.
Burger IM; Wilfond BS
Hum Gene Ther; 2000 May; 11(7):1057-63. PubMed ID: 10811234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What kinds of subjects can understand this protocol?
Levine RJ
IRB; 1984; 6(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 11650664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change.
Philipson SJ; Doyle MA; Gabram SG; Nightingale C; Philipson EH
J Investig Med; 1995 Oct; 43(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 8528757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors related to volunteer comprehension of informed consent for a clinical trial.
Kaewpoonsri N; Okanurak K; Kitayaporn D; Kaewkungwal J; Vijaykadga S; Thamaree S
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2006 Sep; 37(5):996-1004. PubMed ID: 17333746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Deaconess Informed Consent Comprehension Test: an assessment tool for clinical research subjects.
Miller CK; O'Donnell DC; Searight HR; Barbarash RA
Pharmacotherapy; 1996; 16(5):872-8. PubMed ID: 8888082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality assurance questionnaire for professionals fails to improve the quality of informed consent.
Lavori PW; Wilt TJ; Sugarman J
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):638-49. PubMed ID: 18042573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
