161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8629856)
21. Trichloroacetic acid peeling versus dermabrasion: a histometric, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural comparison.
El-Domyati MB; Attia SK; Saleh FY; Ahmad HM; Uitto JJ
Dermatol Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2 Pt 1):179-88. PubMed ID: 14756647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Is there still a place for deep chemical peels in the treatment of perioral wrinkles?
Costa IMC; Peres AS; Costa MC; Figueira RBFDC
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Oct; 19(10):2634-2636. PubMed ID: 32009297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Chemical peels.
Godin DA; Graham HD
J La State Med Soc; 1998 Nov; 150(11):513-20. PubMed ID: 9861801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Complications of resurfacing.
Ragland HP; McBurney E
Semin Cutan Med Surg; 1996 Sep; 15(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 8948539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Combining surgical methods for skin resurfacing.
Coleman WP; Narins RS
Semin Cutan Med Surg; 1996 Sep; 15(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 8948538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative and qualitative effects of chemical peeling on photo-aged skin: an experimental study.
Butler PE; Gonzalez S; Randolph MA; Kim J; Kollias N; Yaremchuk MJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Jan; 107(1):222-8. PubMed ID: 11176627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Chemical Peels: Deep, Medium, and Light.
Starkman SJ; Mangat DS
Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 35(3):239-247. PubMed ID: 31189196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing and dermabrasion in the revision of surgical scars.
Nehal KS; Levine VJ; Ross B; Ashinoff R
Dermatol Surg; 1998 Jun; 24(6):647-50. PubMed ID: 9648572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative histological study of mini pig skin after chemical peel and dermabrasion.
Behin F; Feuerstein SS; Marovitz WF
Arch Otolaryngol; 1977 May; 103(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 856133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The place of laser resurfacing within the range of medical and surgical skin resurfacing techniques.
Roenigk HH
Semin Cutan Med Surg; 1996 Sep; 15(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 8948540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Chemical peels: their place within the range of resurfacing techniques.
Fulton JE; Porumb S
Am J Clin Dermatol; 2004; 5(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 15186197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of dermabrasion and chemical peels in the treatment of patients with xeroderma pigmentosum.
Nelson BR; Fader DJ; Gillard M; Baker SR; Johnson TM
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1995 Apr; 32(4):623-6. PubMed ID: 7896953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 50% TCA, scarring, scarring, and shared risks of resurfacing procedures.
Field LM
Dermatol Surg; 1999 Jul; 25(7):594-5. PubMed ID: 10950580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Dermabrasion using CO2 dry ice.
Fulton JE; Rahimi AD
Dermatol Surg; 1999 Jul; 25(7):544-8. PubMed ID: 10469111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Laser Skin Resurfacing Using an Ultra-Pulse Carbon Dioxide Laser and Manual Dermabrasion Using a Medium-Grit Drywall Sand Screen for Scar Revision in Adults: A Split-Scar Prospective Study.
Taher M; Srivalli N; Yusuf M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 77(2):411.e1-411.e8. PubMed ID: 30458126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CO2 laser resurfacing: why all the fuss?
Dover JS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Sep; 98(3):506-9. PubMed ID: 8700989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Pharmacology of agents used in the management of patients having skin resurfacing.
Demas PN; Bridenstine JB; Braun TW
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Nov; 55(11):1255-8. PubMed ID: 9371116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Erythema after cutaneous laser resurfacing using a porcine model.
Speyer MT; Reinisch L; Cooper KA; Ries WR
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Sep; 124(9):1008-13. PubMed ID: 9738811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Chemical peels in plastic surgery.
Rohrich RJ; Hollier LH
West J Med; 1995 Jun; 162(6):538-9. PubMed ID: 7618317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimizing fluence and debridement effects on cutaneous resurfacing carbon dioxide laser surgery.
Weisberg NK; Kuo T; Torkian B; Reinisch L; Ellis DL
Arch Dermatol; 1998 Oct; 134(10):1223-8. PubMed ID: 9801677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
