These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8629879)

  • 1. The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews.
    Khan KS; Daya S; Jadad A
    Arch Intern Med; 1996 Mar; 156(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 8629879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Riluzole for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/motor neuron disease (MND).
    Miller RG; Mitchell JD; Lyon M; Moore DH
    Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord; 2003 Sep; 4(3):191-206. PubMed ID: 13129806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1249-56. PubMed ID: 17098567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analysis of sulfasalazine in ankylosing spondylitis.
    Ferraz MB; Tugwell P; Goldsmith CH; Atra E
    J Rheumatol; 1990 Nov; 17(11):1482-6. PubMed ID: 1980310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit.
    Bassler D; Ferreira-Gonzalez I; Briel M; Cook DJ; Devereaux PJ; Heels-Ansdell D; Kirpalani H; Meade MO; Montori VM; Rozenberg A; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):869-73. PubMed ID: 17689802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Different methods of allocation to groups in randomized trials are associated with different levels of bias. A meta-epidemiological study.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1070-5. PubMed ID: 21474279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating a summarized odds ratio whilst eliminating publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Sugita M; Kanamori M; Izuno T; Miyakawa M
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1992 Oct; 22(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 1469797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological studies of systematic reviews: is there publication bias?
    Laupacis A
    Arch Intern Med; 1997 Feb; 157(3):357-8. PubMed ID: 9040305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis.
    Detsky AS; Naylor CD; O'Rourke K; McGeer AJ; L'Abbé KA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1992 Mar; 45(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 1569422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis.
    da Costa BR; Hilfiker R; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 23177896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis in epidemiology.
    Yach D
    S Afr Med J; 1990 Jul; 78(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 2371642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?
    Ioannidis JP; Lau J
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9128):590-1. PubMed ID: 9746014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commentary: summary statistics of poor quality studies must be treated cautiously.
    Berlin JA
    BMJ; 1997 Feb; 314(7077):337. PubMed ID: 9040322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic exoskeleton-assisted walking rehabilitation for stroke patients: a bibliometric and visual analysis.
    Wen S; Huang R; Liu L; Zheng Y; Yu H
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1391322. PubMed ID: 38827036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.