These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8630173)

  • 1. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part II: Efficacy of the Preci-disc system for the correction of errors.
    Uludamar A; Leung T
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 8630173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: Stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy.
    Millington ND; Leung T
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 8595110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC; Herbst D
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part I. The effects of tightening the gold screws and placement of a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
    Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):247-53. PubMed ID: 8603168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses.
    al-Turki LE; Chai J; Lautenschlager EP; Hutten MC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 11887597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the stress generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Kim CW; Kim MJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1045-53. PubMed ID: 20162108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
    Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Cresco Bridge and implant concept: presentation of a technology for fabrication of abutment-free, passively fitting superstructures.
    Helldén LB; Ericson G; Olsson CO
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Feb; 25(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 15736782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of the intramobile connector in implant tooth-supported fixed prostheses: an experimental stress analysis.
    Uysal H; Iplikcioğlu H; Avci M; Bilir OG; Kural O
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 8957873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.
    Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of prosthesis fit and the effect of a luting system on the prosthetic connection preload: an in vitro study.
    Duyck J; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 12170855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The longitudinal accuracy of fit of titanium implant superstructures superplastically formed on investment models.
    Soo S; Garriga-Majo D; Palmer RM; Curtis RV
    Dent Mater; 2004 Mar; 20(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 15209232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part 2. The effects of loading a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
    Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Mar; 4(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9171008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
    Hecker DM; Eckert SE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 15248882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of gold-machined UCLA-type abutments and CAD/CAM titanium abutments with hexagonal external connection and with internal connection.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 18548920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the fit of implant-supported superstructures using the spark erosion technique.
    Eisenmann E; Mokabberi A; Walter MH; Freesmeyer WB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):810-8. PubMed ID: 15623055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.