BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8630175)

  • 1. Effects of grinding, polishing, and overglazing on the flexure strength of a high-leucite feldspathic porcelain.
    Williamson RT; Kovarik RE; Mitchell RJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 8630175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material.
    Dalkiz M; Sipahi C; Beydemir B
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 19141045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of surface finish on the flexural strength of feldspathic and aluminous dental ceramics.
    Giordano R; Cima M; Pober R
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 7575972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of extraoral porcelain polishing sequences on surface roughness and color of feldspathic porcelain.
    Yuzugullu B; Celik C; Erkut S; Ozcelik TB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):472-5. PubMed ID: 20095196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical property evaluation of pressable restorative ceramics.
    Drummond JL; King TJ; Bapna MS; Koperski RD
    Dent Mater; 2000 May; 16(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 10762684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of cyclic loading on the strength of all-ceramic materials.
    Ohyama T; Yoshinari M; Oda Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 10196825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics.
    Ahmad R; Morgano SM; Wu BM; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 16275301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites.
    Kantorski KZ; Scotti R; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal.
    Schweitzer DM; Goldstein GR; Ricci JL; Silva NR; Hittelman EL
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 16359480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics.
    Dündar M; Ozcan M; Gökçe B; Cömlekoğlu E; Leite F; Valandro LF
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16844212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of cubic leucite stabilization on the flexural strength of feldspathic dental porcelain.
    Denry IL; Mackert JR; Holloway JA; Rosenstiel SF
    J Dent Res; 1996 Dec; 75(12):1928-35. PubMed ID: 9033446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Initial enamel wear of glazed and polished leucite-based porcelains with different fusing temperatures.
    Adachi LK; Saiki M; de Campos TN; Adachi EM; Shinkai RS
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 19903616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains.
    Sarikaya I; Güler AU
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 20379676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of ion-exchange treatment on mechanical properties of new dental ceramics.
    Kawai K; Inoue M; Tsuchitani Y
    Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 14677615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexural strength of glass-infiltrated zirconia/alumina-based ceramics and feldspathic veneering porcelains.
    Bottino MA; Salazar-Marocho SM; Leite FP; Vásquez VC; Valandro LF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 19432762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical properties and microstructural characterization of dental porcelains mixed with distilled water and modeling liquid.
    Sinmazişik G; Oveçoğlu ML
    Dent Mater; 2006 Aug; 22(8):735-45. PubMed ID: 16324737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of fluoride and 10% carbamide peroxide on the surface roughness of low-fusing and ultra low-fusing porcelain.
    Butler CJ; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Thompson GA; Runyan DA; Anthony von Fraunhofer J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 15295328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repair strength of etched vs silica-coated metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Sindel J
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 11203818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.