167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8631607)
1. Customized implant abutment copings to achieve biologic, mechanical, and esthetic objectives.
Rieder CE
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Feb; 16(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 8631607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Cresco Bridge and implant concept: presentation of a technology for fabrication of abutment-free, passively fitting superstructures.
Helldén LB; Ericson G; Olsson CO
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Feb; 25(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 15736782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Esthetic implant restorations.
Lewis SG
Compendium; 1994 Mar; 15(3):334, 336, 338 passim; quiz 346. PubMed ID: 8205588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
Goossens IC; Herbst D
SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs: a prospective 5-year multicenter study.
Andersson B; Glauser R; Maglione M; Taylor A
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 14714845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights.
Abbo B; Razzoog ME; Vivas J; Sierraalta M
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18182182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments.
Priest G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9 Suppl 2):22-32. PubMed ID: 16125013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Description and evaluation of a simplified method to achieve passive fit between cast titanium frameworks and implants.
Helldén LB; Dérand T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 9581404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration.
Grossmann Y; Pasciuta M; Finger IM
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16543025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A modular approach to dental implant therapy: the appropriate selection of one- and two-stage surgeries.
Cooper LF
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Sep; 23(9 Suppl 2):4-12. PubMed ID: 12790008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A laboratory procedure for optimal implant abutment preparation.
Ozcelik TB; Yilmaz B
J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):537-40. PubMed ID: 19500234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-pinning: the philosophy of retrievability applied practically to fixed, implant-supported prostheses.
Gervais MJ; Hatzipanagiotis P; Wilson PR
Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 18304245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Integrated Abutment Crownt, a screwless and cementless restoration for single-tooth implants: a report on a new technique.
Urdaneta RA; Marincola M
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 17451473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
